The Public's Bounded Understanding of Science

被引:204
作者
Bromme, Rainer [1 ]
Goldman, Susan R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Psychol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LEARNING PROGRESSION; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/00461520.2014.921572
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This introduction to the special issue Understanding the Public Understanding of Science: Psychological Approaches discusses some of the challenges people face in understanding science. We focus on people's inevitably bounded understanding of science topics; research must address how people make decisions in science domains such as health and medicine without having the deep and extensive understanding that is characteristic of domain experts. The articles reflect two broad streams of research on the public understanding of science-the learning orientation that seeks to improve understanding through better instruction and the communications orientation that focuses on attitudes about science and trust in scientists. Challenges to understanding science include determining the relevance of information, the tentativeness of scientific truth, distinguishing between scientific and nonscientific issues, and determining what is true and what is false. Studying the public understanding of science can potentially contribute to psychological theories of thinking and reasoning in modern societies.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 69
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [51] Epistemic Vigilance
    Sperber, Dan
    Clement, Fabrice
    Heintz, Christophe
    Mascaro, Olivier
    Mercier, Hugo
    Origgi, Gloria
    Wilson, Deirdre
    [J]. MIND & LANGUAGE, 2010, 25 (04) : 359 - 393
  • [52] Stadtler M., 2013, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, P3448
  • [53] Comprehending Multiple Documents on Scientific Controversies: Effects of Reading Goals and Signaling Rhetorical Relationships
    Stadtler, Marc
    Scharrer, Lisa
    Skodzik, Timo
    Bromme, Rainer
    [J]. DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2014, 51 (1-2) : 93 - 116
  • [54] Dealing With Uncertainty: Readers' Memory for and Use of Conflicting Information From Science Texts as Function of Presentation Format and Source Expertise
    Stadtler, Marc
    Scharrer, Lisa
    Brummernhenrich, Benjamin
    Bromme, Rainer
    [J]. COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2013, 31 (02) : 130 - 150
  • [55] Taylor RS, 2011, EPISTEMOLOGY AND SCIENCE EDUCATION: UNDERSTANDING THE EVOLUTION VS INTELLIGENT DESIGN CONTROVERSY, P1