Assessing What Brexit Means for Europe: Implications for EU Institutions and Actors

被引:2
作者
Bressanelli, Edoardo [1 ]
Chelotti, Nicola [2 ]
机构
[1] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Dirpolis Inst, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] Loughborough Univ London, Inst Diplomacy & Int Governance, London E20 3BS, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Brexit; Council of the EU; Court of Justice; European Parliament; institutional change; interest groups; negotiations; Norway; United Kingdom; NATION;
D O I
10.17645/pag.v9i1.3982
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Y With the signing of the EU-UK trade and cooperation agreement in December 2020, the configurations of Brexit have started to become clearer. The first consequences of the UK's decision to leave the EU have become visible, both in the UK and in the EU. This thematic issue focuses on a relatively under-researched aspect of Brexit-what the UK withdrawal has meant and means for the EU. Using new empirical data and covering most (if not all) of the post-2016 referendum period, it provides a first overall assessment of the impact of Brexit on the main EU institutions, institutional rules and actors. The articles in the issue reveal that EU institutions and actors changed patterns of behaviour and norms well before the formal exit of the UK in January 2020. They have adopted 'counter-measures' to cope with the challenges of the UK withdrawal-be it new organizational practices in the Parliament, different network dynamics in the Council of the EU or the strengthening of the Franco-German partnership. In this sense, the Union has-so far-shown significant resilience in the wake of Brexit.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Best Edwards., 2008, The institutions of the enlarged European Union: Continuity and change
[2]   Managing Disintegration: How the European Parliament Responded and Adapted to Brexit [J].
Bressanelli, Edoardo ;
Chelotti, Nicola ;
Lehmann, Wilhelm .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 9 (01) :16-26
[3]   Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier? [J].
Coen, David ;
Katsaitis, Alexander .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 9 (01) :37-47
[4]   The Ordinary Legislative Procedure in a Post-Brexit EU: The Case of Social Europe [J].
Copeland, Paul .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 9 (01) :69-78
[5]   The Impact of Brexit on EU Policies [J].
De Ville, Ferdi ;
Siles-Brugge, Gabriel .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2019, 7 (03) :1-6
[6]  
Diamond P., 2018, Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit
[7]   A NATION DIVIDED [J].
Ford, Robert ;
Goodwin, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2017, 28 (01) :17-30
[8]   Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? Norwegians' Assessments of Brexit [J].
Fossum, John Erik ;
Vigrestad, Joachim .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 9 (01) :79-89
[9]   The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent [J].
Hobolt, Sara B. .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 23 (09) :1259-1277
[10]   Don't cry for me Britannia: The resilience of the European Union to Brexit [J].
Huhe, Narisong ;
Naurin, Daniel ;
Thomson, Robert .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2020, 21 (01) :152-172