Tumor Characterization with Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biodegradable Macromolecular Contrast Agents in Mice

被引:19
|
作者
Wu, Xueming [1 ]
Feng, Yi [2 ]
Jeong, Eun-Kee [3 ]
Emerson, Lyska [4 ]
Lu, Zheng-Rong [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Pharmaceut & Pharmaceut Chem, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Radiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
biodegradable macromolecular contrast agent; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; polydisulfides; tumor characterization; PROSTATE-CANCER; GD-DTPA; VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY; KINETIC-PARAMETERS; MOLECULAR-WEIGHTS; MRI; ANGIOGENESIS; MEDIA; CARCINOMA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11095-009-9935-x
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To investigate the efficacy of polydisulfide-based biodegradable macromolecular contrast agents of different degradability and molecular weight for tumor characterization based on angiogenesis using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Biodegradable macromolecular MRI contrast agents, Gd-DTPA cystamine copolymers (GDCC) and Gd-DTPA cystine copolymers (GDCP), with molecular weight of 20 and 70 KDa were evaluated for tumor characterization. Gd(DTPA-BMA) and a prototype of macromolecular contrast agent, albumin-(Gd-DTPA), were used as controls. The DCE-MRI studies were performed in nude mice bearing MDA PCa 2b and PC-3 human prostate tumor xenografts. Tumor angiogenic kinetic parameters including endothelium transfer coefficient (K-trans) and fractional tumor plasma volume (f(PV)) were calculated from the DCE-MRI data using a two-compartment model and compared between the two different tumor models for each contrast agent. There was no significant difference in the f(PV) values between two tumor models estimated with the same agent except for GDCC-70. The K-trans values in both tumor models decreased with the increase of molecular weight of contrast agents. With the same high molecular weight (70 KDa), GDCC-70 showed a higher K-trans values than GDCP-70 due to high degradability of the former in both tumor models (p < 0.05). The K-trans values of MDA PCa 2b tumors were significantly higher than those of PC-3 tumors estimated by Gd(DTPA-BMA), GDCC-20, GDCC-70, GDCP-70, and albumin-(Gd-DTPA) (p < 0.05). The polydisulfide-based biodegradable macromolecular MRI contrast agents are promising in tumor characterization and differentiation with dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:2202 / 2208
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tumor Permeability of Nanocarriers Observed by Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kawano, Kumi
    Maitani, Yoshie
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2010, 130 (12): : 1679 - 1685
  • [22] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumor interstitial fluid pressure
    Gulliksrud, Kristine
    Brurberg, Kjetil G.
    Rofstad, Einar K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 91 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [23] Fast magnetic resonance fingerprinting for dynamic contrast-enhanced studies in mice
    Gu, Yuning
    Wang, Charlie Y.
    Anderson, Christian E.
    Liu, Yuchi
    Hu, He
    Johansen, Mette L.
    Ma, Dan
    Jiang, Yun
    Ramos-Estebanez, Ciro
    Brady-Kalnay, Susann
    Griswold, Mark A.
    Flask, Chris A.
    Yu, Xin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (06) : 2681 - 2690
  • [24] Genetic Encoding of Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents for Tumor Imaging
    Schuerle, Simone
    Furubayashi, Maiko
    Soleimany, Ava P.
    Gwisai, Tinotenda
    Huang, Wei
    Voigt, Christopher
    Bhatia, Sangeeta N.
    ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02): : 392 - 401
  • [25] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for head and neck cancers
    Elhalawani, Hesham
    Ger, Rachel B.
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    Awan, Musaddiq J.
    Ding, Yao
    Li, Kimberly
    Fave, Xenia J.
    Beers, Andrew L.
    Driscoll, Brandon
    Hormuth, David A., II
    van Houdt, Petra J.
    He, Renjie
    Zhou, Shouhao
    Mathieu, Kelsey B.
    Li, Heng
    Coolens, Catherine
    Chung, Caroline
    Bankson, James A.
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Jihong
    Sandulache, Vlad C.
    Lai, Stephen Y.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Stafford, R. Jason
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Barboriak, Daniel P.
    Hazle, John D.
    Court, Laurence E.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5
  • [26] Maximum Entropy Approach in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Farsani, Zahra Amini
    Schmid, Volker J.
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2017, 56 (06) : 461 - 468
  • [27] A direct comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and prediction of aggressiveness
    Baur, Alexander D. J.
    Schwabe, Julia
    Rogasch, Julian
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Stephan, Carsten
    Rudl, Marc
    Hamm, Bernd
    Jung, Ernst-Michael
    Fischer, Thom
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) : 1949 - 1960
  • [28] A role for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting tumour radiation response
    Hallac, Rami R.
    Zhou, Heling
    Pidikiti, Rajesh
    Song, Kwang
    Solberg, Timothy
    Kodibagkar, Vikram D.
    Peschke, Peter
    Mason, Ralph P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (11) : 1206 - 1211
  • [29] Comparison of Models and Contrast Agents for Improved Signal and Signal Linearity in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bell, Laura C.
    Wang, Kang
    Del Rio, Alejandro Munoz
    Grist, Thomas M.
    Fain, Sean B.
    Nagle, Scott K.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (03) : 174 - 178
  • [30] Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agents for Liver Imaging
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 22 (03) : 283 - +