Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression model for factors affecting birth weight

被引:5
作者
Kirisci, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Hasan Ali Yucel Educ Fac, Dept Math Educ, TR-34470 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2019年 / 1卷 / 04期
关键词
Artificial neural network; Logistic regression; ROC curve; Neonate; Birth weight; MATERNAL SMOKING; PRETERM DELIVERY; CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS; DESIGN; HEALTH; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-019-0391-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of this work compares the ANN and logistic regression analysis to determine the factors affecting birth weight. This study included 223 newborn babies. The records of babies born between January 2017 and December 2017 were used. The data were obtained from Beykoz district of Istanbul. ANN and logistic regression analysis of the method obtained based on these records were evaluated. Logistic regression revealed the items GB, MA, GA, NH, BMI, MPPW, MWGP, MsAU, MsCU, MsE as significant factors for BW.The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AuROC) curve 0.941 (SD = 0.0012) for ANN and 0.909 (SD = 0.019) for Logistic Regression model.The ANNs may be trained with data acquired in various contexts and can consider local expertise, differences, and other variables with uncertain effects on outcome. Although the ANN value is greater than the LR value, these results are very close to each other.This shows us that in terms of their classification ability, these two methods are approximately equal to each other.The results we have seen in our study show that in the medical diagnosis, neither model can change the other. Both models can be used as a complement to help with decision-making. Both models have the potential to help physicians with respect to understanding BW risk factors, risk estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring outcomes [J].
Agrawal, Arpana ;
Scherrer, Jeffrey F. ;
Grant, Julia D. ;
Sartor, Carolyn E. ;
Pergadia, Michele L. ;
Duncan, Alexis E. ;
Madden, Pamela A. F. ;
Haber, Jon Randolph ;
Jacob, Theodore ;
Bucholz, Kathleen K. ;
Xian, Hong .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 50 (1-2) :13-18
[2]   Artificial neural networks in medical diagnosis [J].
Amato, Filippo ;
Lopez, Alberto ;
Pena-Mendez, Eladia Maria ;
Vanhara, Petr ;
Hampl, Ales ;
Havel, Josef .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 11 (02) :47-58
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM COLL OBST GYN ACO
[4]  
[Anonymous], EUR J GASTROENTEROL
[5]  
[Anonymous], SICE ANN C 20 23 AUG
[6]  
[Anonymous], SALCAKLA DERGISI
[7]  
[Anonymous], AM J PUBLIC HLTH
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision
[9]   Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Merlo, Juan .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (20) :3257-3277
[10]   Informatics in Radiology Comparison of Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models in Breast Cancer Risk Estimation [J].
Ayer, Turgay ;
Chhatwal, Jagpreet ;
Alagoz, Oguzhan ;
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. ;
Woods, Ryan W. ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (01) :13-U27