AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

被引:54
作者
Kim, Min Seong [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Jeongmin [3 ]
Shin, Won Chang [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Liver Res Inst, Coll Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Sanggye Paik Hosp, 1342 Dongil Ro, Seoul 01757, South Korea
关键词
Stomach; Gastrointestinal hemorrhage; AIMS65; score; Glasgow-Blatchford score; Rockall score; RISK STRATIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; ENDOSCOPY; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; NEED;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-019-1051-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundRisk stratification for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (NVUGI) bleeding is crucial for successful prognosis and treatment. Recently, the AIMS65 score has been used to predict mortality risk and rebleeding. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall score, and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in Korea.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 512 patients with NVUGI bleeding who were treated at a university hospital between 2013 and 2016. The AIMS65, GBS, Rockall score, and pre-endoscopic Rockall score were used to stratify patients based on their bleeding risk. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were composite clinical outcomes of mortality, rebleeding, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Each scoring system was compared using the receiver-operating curve (ROC).ResultsA total of 17 patients (3.3%) died and rebleeding developed in 65 patients (12.7%). Eighty-six patients (16.8%) required ICU admission. The AIMS65 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.88)) seemed to be superior to the GBS (AUC 0.72, 0.68-0.76), the Rockall score (AUC 0.75, 0.71-0.79), or the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (AUC 0.74, 0.70-0.78) in predicting in-hospital mortality, but there was not a statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.07). The AUC value of the AIMS65 was not significantly different from the other scoring systems in prediction of rebleeding, endoscopic intervention, or ICU admission.ConclusionsThe AIMS65 score in NVUGI bleeding patients was comparable to the GBS or Rockall scoring systems when predicting the mortality, rebleeding, or ICU admission. Because AIMS65 is a much easier, readily calculated scoring system compared to the others, we would recommend using the AIMS65 in daily practice.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding [J].
Barkun, Alan N. ;
Bardou, Marc ;
Kuipers, Ernst J. ;
Sung, Joseph ;
Hunt, Richard H. ;
Martel, Myriam ;
Sinclair, Paul .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 152 (02) :101-+
[2]   A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage [J].
Blatchford, O ;
Murray, WR ;
Blatchford, M .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9238) :1318-1321
[3]   Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding [J].
Bryant, Robert V. ;
Kuo, Paul ;
Williamson, Kate ;
Yam, Chantelle ;
Schoeman, Mark N. ;
Holloway, Richard H. ;
Nguyen, Nam Q. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (04) :576-583
[4]   External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting [J].
Chandra, Subhash ;
Hess, Erik P. ;
Agarwal, Dipti ;
Nestler, David M. ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Song, Louis M. Wong Kee ;
Wells, George A. ;
Stiell, Ian G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 30 (05) :673-679
[5]   Is the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding? [J].
Choe, Jung Wan ;
Kim, Seung Young ;
Hyun, Jong Jin ;
Jung, Sung Woo ;
Jung, Young Kul ;
Koo, Ja Seol ;
Yim, Hyung Joon ;
Lee, Sang Woo .
GUT AND LIVER, 2017, 11 (06) :813-820
[6]   Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2013 Update A Report From the American Heart Association [J].
Go, Alan S. ;
Mozaffarian, Dariush ;
Roger, Veronique L. ;
Benjamin, Emelia J. ;
Berry, Jarett D. ;
Borden, William B. ;
Bravata, Dawn M. ;
Dai, Shifan ;
Ford, Earl S. ;
Fox, Caroline S. ;
Franco, Sheila ;
Fullerton, Heather J. ;
Gillespie, Cathleen ;
Hailpern, Susan M. ;
Heit, John A. ;
Howard, Virginia J. ;
Huffman, Mark D. ;
Kissela, Brett M. ;
Kittner, Steven J. ;
Lackland, Daniel T. ;
Lichtman, Judith H. ;
Lisabeth, Lynda D. ;
Magid, David ;
Marcus, Gregory M. ;
Marelli, Ariane ;
Matchar, David B. ;
McGuire, Darren K. ;
Mohler, Emile R. ;
Moy, Claudia S. ;
Mussolino, Michael E. ;
Nichol, Graham ;
Paynter, Nina P. ;
Schreiner, Pamela J. ;
Sorlie, Paul D. ;
Stein, Joel ;
Turan, Tanya N. ;
Virani, Salim S. ;
Wong, Nathan D. ;
Woo, Daniel ;
Turner, Melanie B. .
CIRCULATION, 2013, 127 (01) :E6-E245
[7]  
Gralnek IM., 2015, ENDOSCOPY, DOI [DOI 10.1055/S-0034-1393172, 10.1055/s-0034-1393172]
[8]   Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding [J].
Kalkan, Cagdas ;
Soykan, Irfan ;
Karakaya, Fatih ;
Tuzun, Ali ;
Gencturk, Zeynep Biyikli .
GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 17 (04) :575-583
[9]   Timing of upper endoscopy influences outcomes in patients with acute nonvariceal upper GI bleeding [J].
Kumar, Navin L. ;
Cohen, Aaron J. ;
Nayor, Jennifer ;
Claggett, Brian L. ;
Saltzman, John R. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) :945-+
[10]  
Laine L, 2012, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V107, P1190, DOI 10.1038/ajg.2012.168