Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part I: development of a convolutional neural network classifier for multi-phasic MRI

被引:242
作者
Hamm, Charlie A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Clinton J. [1 ]
Savic, Lynn J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ferrante, Marc [1 ]
Schobert, Isabel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schlachter, Todd [1 ]
Lin, MingDe [1 ]
Duncan, James S. [1 ,5 ]
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. [1 ]
Chapiro, Julius [1 ]
Letzen, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Berlin Inst Hlth, Inst Radiol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[5] Yale Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Biomed Engn, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Liver cancer; Deep learning; Artificial intelligence; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LI-RADS; LESIONS; FEATURES; RELIABILITY; ACCURACY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-019-06205-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo develop and validate a proof-of-concept convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning system (DLS) that classifies common hepatic lesions on multi-phasic MRI.MethodsA custom CNN was engineered by iteratively optimizing the network architecture and training cases, finally consisting of three convolutional layers with associated rectified linear units, two maximum pooling layers, and two fully connected layers. Four hundred ninety-four hepatic lesions with typical imaging features from six categories were utilized, divided into training (n=434) and test (n=60) sets. Established augmentation techniques were used to generate 43,400 training samples. An Adam optimizer was used for training. Monte Carlo cross-validation was performed. After model engineering was finalized, classification accuracy for the final CNN was compared with two board-certified radiologists on an identical unseen test set.ResultsThe DLS demonstrated a 92% accuracy, a 92% sensitivity (Sn), and a 98% specificity (Sp). Test set performance in a single run of random unseen cases showed an average 90% Sn and 98% Sp. The average Sn/Sp on these same cases for radiologists was 82.5%/96.5%. Results showed a 90% Sn for classifying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to 60%/70% for radiologists. For HCC classification, the true positive and false positive rates were 93.5% and 1.6%, respectively, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.992. Computation time per lesion was 5.6ms.ConclusionThis preliminary deep learning study demonstrated feasibility for classifying lesions with typical imaging features from six common hepatic lesion types, motivating future studies with larger multi-institutional datasets and more complex imaging appearances.Key Points center dot Deep learning demonstrates high performance in the classification of liver lesions on volumetric multi-phasic MRI, showingpotential as an eventual decision-support tool for radiologists.center dot Demonstrating a classification runtime of a few milliseconds per lesion, a deep learning system could be incorporated into the clinical workflow in a time-efficient manner.
引用
收藏
页码:3338 / 3347
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Automated diagnosis of focal liver lesions using bidirectional empirical mode decomposition features [J].
Acharya, U. Rajendra ;
Koh, Joel En Wei ;
Hagiwara, Yuki ;
Tan, Jen Hong ;
Gertych, Arkadiusz ;
Vijayananthan, Anushya ;
Yaakup, Nur Adura ;
Abdullah, Basri Johan Jeet ;
Fabell, Mohd Kamil Bin Mohd ;
Yeong, Chai Hong .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 94 :11-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Lancet, V389, pe1, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32607-1, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32609-5, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32605-8, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32610-1, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32632-0, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32608-3, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32606-X]
[3]   Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS - An In-depth Analysis [J].
Barth, Borna K. ;
Donati, Olivio F. ;
Fischer, Michael A. ;
Ulbrich, Erika J. ;
Karlo, Christoph A. ;
Becker, Anton ;
Seifert, Burkhard ;
Reiner, Caecilia S. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) :1145-1153
[4]   Concordance of hypervascular liver nodule characterization between the organ procurement and transplant network and liver imaging reporting and data system classifications [J].
Bashir, Mustafa R. ;
Huang, Rong ;
Mayes, Nicholas ;
Marin, Daniele ;
Berg, Carl L. ;
Nelson, Rendon C. ;
Jaffe, Tracy A. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) :305-314
[5]   Assessing tumor response after loco-regional liver cancer therapies: the role of 3D MRI [J].
Chapiro, Julius ;
Lin, MingDe ;
Duran, Rafael ;
Schernthaner, Ruediger E. ;
Geschwind, Jean-Francois .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (02) :199-205
[6]   Radiologic-Pathologic Analysis of Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Patients with HCC after TACE: Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D Quantitative Image Analysis [J].
Chapiro, Julius ;
Wood, Laura D. ;
Lin, MingDe ;
Duran, Rafael ;
Cornish, Toby ;
Lesag, David ;
Charu, Vivek ;
Schernthaner, Ruediger ;
Wang, Zhijun ;
Tacher, Vania ;
Savic, Lynn Jeanette ;
Kamel, Ihab R. ;
Geschwind, Jean-Francois .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 273 (03) :746-758
[7]  
Chollet F., 2015, Keras
[8]   Repeatability of Diagnostic Features and Scoring Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using MR Imaging [J].
Davenport, Matthew S. ;
Khalatbari, Shokoufeh ;
Liu, Peter S. C. ;
Maturen, Katherine E. ;
Kaza, Ravi K. ;
Wasnik, Ashish P. ;
Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M. ;
Glazer, Daniel I. ;
Stein, Erica B. ;
Patel, Jeet ;
Somashekar, Deepak K. ;
Viglianti, Benjamin L. ;
Hussain, Hero K. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 272 (01) :132-142
[9]   Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas [J].
Ehman, Eric C. ;
Behr, Spencer C. ;
Umetsu, Sarah E. ;
Fidelman, Nicholas ;
Yeh, Ben M. ;
Ferrell, Linda D. ;
Hope, Thomas A. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (05) :963-969
[10]   Hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis [J].
El-Serag, Hashem B. ;
Rudolph, Lenhard .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (07) :2557-2576