Evaluation of an easy and affordable flow cytometer for volumetric haematopoietic stem cell counting

被引:9
作者
Mariani, Mariagabriella [1 ]
Colombo, Federico [1 ]
Assennato, Sonny M. [1 ]
Frugoni, Cecilia [1 ]
Cattaneo, Alessandra [1 ]
Trombetta, Elena [1 ]
Rebulla, Paolo [1 ]
Porretti, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Maggiore Hosp Policlin, IRCCS Ca Granda Fdn, Lab Clin Chem & Microbiol, Flow Cytometry Serv, Milan, Italy
关键词
haematopoietic stem cells; volumetric flow cytometry; apheresis; PROGENITOR CELLS; ENUMERATION; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.2450/2014.0198-13
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Accurate estimation of haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) counts by flow cytometry may be difficult in laboratories in which sophisticated equipment and staff with specific expertise are not available. Affordable flow cytometers that can perform basic functions may help to overcome these difficulties. In this study we compared HSC and leucocyte counts determined by volumetric and bead-based protocols performed with the small, low-cost Accuri (R) C6, with those obtained with two gold-standard instruments, the four-colour FACSCalibur (R) and the eight-colour FACSCantoII (R), our reference flow cytometers. Materials and methods. With the three cytometers we tested, in parallel, 111 consecutive samples from cord blood, peripheral blood from patients with myelofibrosis and myeloproliferative syndromes, fresh and thawed HSC collected by apheresis and bone marrow products. The findings were compared with one-way ANOVA, Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression. Results. The results of HSC and leucocyte enumeration by the three devices were strongly correlated (r(2)>0.99; p<0.0001). ANOVA performed on different subgroups of samples did not reveal significant differences between HSC count determined by the C6 bead-based and reference flow cytometers in any of the subgroups. Regarding the C6 volumetric protocol, a statistically significant difference was observed only in the cord blood subgroup. Time for instrument set-up, calibration and analysis was slightly longer with Accuri (R) C6 (40 min) than with FACSCantoII (R) (30 min). Discussion. Accuri (R) C6 is a reliable instrument for HSC enumeration in fresh samples, using both volumetric and bead-based approaches, although the volumetric protocol on cord blood samples needs to be improved. The Accuri (R) C6 is easy to use, does not require profound knowledge of flow cytometry and could be employed in an urgent setting. Its performance may be improved by more efficient calibration and shorter analysis time.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 420
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
Brando B, 2001, CYTOMETRY, V43, P154, DOI 10.1002/1097-0320(20010201)43:2<154::AID-CYTO1031>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]   Medical progress: Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation [J].
Copelan, EA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (17) :1813-1826
[5]  
Gajkowska A, 2006, FOLIA HISTOCHEM CYTO, V44, P53
[6]   Simultaneous Flow Cytometric Quantification of Plant Nuclear DNA Contents Over the Full Range of Described Angiosperm 2C Values [J].
Galbraith, David W. .
CYTOMETRY PART A, 2009, 75A (08) :692-698
[7]   Direct volumetric flow cytometric quantitation of CD34+stem and progenitor cells [J].
Gutensohn, K. ;
Nikolitsis, A. ;
Gramatzki, M. ;
Spitzer, D. ;
Buwitt-Beckmann, U. ;
Humpe, A. .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 2012, 22 (03) :205-210
[8]   Microflow Cytometer for optical analysis of phytoplankton [J].
Hashemi, Nastaran ;
Erickson, Jeffrey S. ;
Golden, Joel P. ;
Jackson, Kirsten M. ;
Ligler, Frances S. .
BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2011, 26 (11) :4263-4269
[9]  
Keeney M, 1998, CYTOMETRY, V34, P61, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980415)34:2<61::AID-CYTO1>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-F