Does funding of waste services follow the polluter pays principle? The case of Spain

被引:16
作者
Chamizo-Gonzalez, Julian [1 ]
Cano-Montero, Elisa-Isabel [2 ]
Munoz-Colomina, Clara-Isabel [3 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Accounting, Av Francisco Tomas y Valiente 5, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[2] Castilla La Mancha Univ, Fac Social Sci Talavera, Dept Business Adm, Av Real Fabr Seda S-N, E-45600 Toledo, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Accounting & Financial Econ 2, Campus Somosaguas, E-28232 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Municipal solid waste (MSW); Waste charge (MSWCh); Spain; Properties; Pay as you throw; Sustainability; AS-YOU-THROW; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; RESPONSIBILITY; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCE; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.225
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The generation of municipal solid waste is a problem for societies aspiring to sustainability within their municipalities. Policymakers responsible for this issue apply formulas to fund solid waste management by charging taxes or fees. The formulas differ in that some link charges to the event or to the producer of the waste rather than to the environmental'polluter pays principle'. Among the range of options for funding this service, the literature identifies "pay as you throw" (PAYT), as the method that most directly relates user charges to contributions to environmental sustainability. This study begins by exploring the types of charges in effect in 52 Spanish provincial capitals and, where applicable, the variables to which they are related. Next, it conducts a case study of the city of Madrid, whose solid waste charge, in force from 2009 to 2014, was based on property values. The case study aims to confirm the relationship-over time-between waste generated (total and per property), number of properties (place where the waste was generated) and properties rateable value. The results reveal, first, that the most widely-used solution at local government level is the easiest to apply-namely, a flat rate per household or a step-variable flat rate covering on average 59.03% of the cost (in 2012); and, second, that Madrid's waste step-flat rate cannot be considered a PAYT system, despite it covers up to 70% of the cost (in 2012). (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1063
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Agenda de Residus de Catalunya, 2010, GUIA IMPL SIST PAG G
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, P1
[3]  
Archel Domench P., 2011, REV CONTAB, V4, P129
[4]   How Does the European Recovery Target for Construction & Demolition Waste Affect Resource Management? [J].
Arm, Maria ;
Wik, Ola ;
Engelsen, Christian J. ;
Erlandsson, Martin ;
Hjelmar, Ole ;
Wahlstrom, Margareta .
WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2017, 8 (05) :1491-1504
[5]   From traditional to modern fee systems [J].
Bilitewski, Bernd .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (12) :2760-2766
[6]   Pay-as-you-throw - A tool for urban waste management [J].
Bilitewski, H. C. Bernd .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (12) :2759-2759
[7]   Better the devil you throw: Experience and support for pay-as-you-throw waste charges [J].
Brown, Zachary S. ;
Johnstone, Nick .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 38 :132-142
[8]  
Chamizo J., 2013, FINANCIAL EC MUNICIP
[9]  
Chamizo-Gonzalez J., 2010, ASPECTOS EC MEDIOAMB
[10]   Municipal Solid Waste Management services and its funding in Spain [J].
Chamizo-Gonzalez, Julian ;
Isabel Cano-Montero, Elisa ;
Isabel Munoz-Colomina, Clara .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 107 :65-72