Impact of Fellowship During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

被引:5
作者
Romero, Rey Jesus [1 ]
Arad, Jonathan Kirsch [1 ]
Kosanovic, Radomir [1 ]
Lamoureux, Julie [2 ]
Gonzalez, Anthony Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Hlth South Florida, Dept Gen & Bariatr Surg, Miami, FL 33173 USA
[2] West Kendall Baptist Hosp, Dept Qual & Risk Management, Miami, FL USA
关键词
Single incision; Laparoscopy; Cholecystectomy; Fellowship; Education; Learning curve; SURGERY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.4293/108680813X13693422520765
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs have been created in response to advancements in technology and patient's demands. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a technique that has been shown to be safe and feasible, but this appears to be the case only for experienced surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive surgery fellow participation during STLC. Methods: We reviewed data from our experience with STIC during 3 years. The cases were divided in two groups: group 1 comprised procedures performed by the main attending without the presence of the fellow, and group 2 comprised procedures performed with the fellow present during the operation. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, indication for surgery, total surgical time, hospital length of stay, and complications were evaluated. Results: The cohort included 229 patients: 142 (62%) were included in group 1 and 87 (38%) in group 2. No differences were found in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and indication for surgery between groups. The total surgical time was 34.4 +/- 11.4 minutes for group 1 and 46.8 +/- 16.0 minutes for group 2 (P < .001). The hospital length of stay was 0.89 +/- 0.32 days for group 1 and 1.01 +/- 0.40 days for group 2 (P = .027). No intraoperative complications were seen in either group. There were 3 postoperative complications (2.1%) in group 1 and none in group 2 (P = .172). Conclusion: Adoption of SILC during an established fellowship program is safe and feasible. A longer surgical time is expected during the teaching process.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Impact of Bariatric Fellowship Training on Perioperative Outcomes for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the First Year as Consultant Surgeon
    Agrawal, Sanjay
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2011, 21 (12) : 1817 - 1821
  • [2] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Pointner, Rudolph
    Granderath, Frank A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (02): : 367 - 377
  • [3] Ceci F, 2012, G CHIR, V33, P280
  • [4] Chang SKY, 2012, SINGAP MED J, V53, P377
  • [5] Single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-incision and multi-port technique
    Choi, Sung Hoon
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Lee, Woo Jung
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 82 (7-8) : 529 - 534
  • [6] Culp Brittney L, 2012, Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent), V25, P319
  • [7] Transgastric hybrid cholecystectomy
    Dallemagne, B.
    Perretta, S.
    Allemann, P.
    Asakuma, M.
    Marescaux, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (10) : 1162 - 1166
  • [8] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Garg, Pankaj
    Thakur, Jai Deep
    Garg, Mahak
    Menon, Geetha R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (08) : 1618 - 1628
  • [9] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy A Systematic Review
    Hall, Thomas C.
    Dennison, Ashley R.
    Bilku, Dilraj K.
    Metcalfe, Matthew S.
    Garcea, Giuseppe
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (07) : 657 - 666
  • [10] The Learning Curve of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy: Definable, Short, and Safe
    Hernandez, Jonathan
    Ross, Sharona
    Morton, Connor
    McFarlin, Kellie
    Dahal, Sujat
    Golkar, Farhaad
    Albrink, Michael
    Rosemurgy, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (05) : 652 - 657