Immigrants, Cultural Differences, and Trade Costs

被引:4
作者
Tadesse, Bedassa [1 ]
White, Roger [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812 USA
[2] Whittier Coll, Whittier, CA USA
关键词
GENETIC-DISTANCE;
D O I
10.1111/imig.12291
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the effects of immigrants and cross-societal cultural differences on bilateral trade costs using two alternative measures of cultural differences (i.e. cultural distance and genetic distance). We find that bilateral trade costs generally increase with a rise in the cultural distance between trading partners but fall with a rise in the stock of immigrants. This implies that immigrants counter bilateral trade costs that are associated with greater cultural differences. Our observation is relevant from both migration and trade policy perspectives as it provides further evidence that immigrants serve as conduits for bridging cultural differences, facilitate international transactions, and enhance global economic integration.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 74
页数:24
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, POLICY RES WORKING P
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, TINBERGEN I DISCUSSI
  • [3] The "Out of Africa" Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic Development
    Ashraf, Quamrul
    Galor, Oded
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) : 1 - 46
  • [4] Boisso DaleE., 1997, J EC INTEGRATION, V12, P456
  • [5] Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII), 2015 GRAV DAT
  • [6] Cultural Distance and Bilateral Trade
    Cyrus, Teresa L.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (04):
  • [7] Bilateral trade of cultural goods
    Disdier, Anne-Celia
    Tai, Silvio H. T.
    Fontagne, Lionel
    Mayer, Thierry
    [J]. REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2010, 145 (04) : 575 - 595
  • [8] Dunlevy JA, 2006, REV ECON STAT, V88, P182
  • [9] Genc Murat., 2011, The Impact of Immigration on International Trade: A Meta-Analysis
  • [10] Genetic distance, transportation costs, and trade1
    Giuliano, Paola
    Spilimbergo, Antonio
    Tonon, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 14 (01) : 179 - 198