Dose safety motivation mediate the effect of psychological contract of safety on flight attendants ' safety performance outcomes?: A social exchange perspective

被引:18
作者
Vatankhah, Sanaz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kyrenia, Fac Aviat & Space Sci, Dept Aviat Management, Via Mersin 10, Kyrenia, Turkish Republi, Turkey
关键词
Psychological contract of safety; Safety motivation; Flight attendant; Airline; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS; MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT; CREATIVE PERFORMANCE; WORKPLACE SAFETY; RISK PERCEPTION; AIRLINE PILOTS; WORK PRACTICES; SELF-EFFICACY; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101945
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This study proposes and tests a conceptual model that investigates the mediating effect of safety motivation linking psychological contract of safety (PCS) as manifested by employer obligations of safety and employee obligations of safety to safety violations and safety creative performance (SCP). Data were collected from a sample of flight attendants with two weeks time lag in Iran. Underpinned by social exchange theory, the results of structural equation modeling revealed that safety motivation fully mediates the simultaneous effects of PCS indicators on safety violations and SCP. Specifically, indicators of PCS jointly enhance safety motivation. In turn, safety motivation reduces safety violations, while enhancing SCP. Theoretical and practical implications evoked from the results advance existing knowledge of organizationally social interactions in promoting safety and the motivational mechanism through which PCS predicts employees' safety performance outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   A systematic review of safety violations in industry [J].
Alper, Samuel J. ;
Karsh, Ben-Tzion .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2009, 41 (04) :739-754
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, QUAL MARK RES, DOI DOI 10.1108/13522750010322070
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MANAGING RISKS ORG A
[5]  
Arbuckle J.L., 1999, AMOS 40 USERS GUIDE
[6]  
Argyris C., 1960, J ACAD MARKET SCI
[7]  
Baiche B., 2006, STRUCT SURV, V24, P279, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02630800610704427, 10.1108/02630800610704427]
[8]   Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited [J].
Bandura, A ;
Locke, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :87-99
[9]   A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy MADM method for airlines safety evaluation [J].
Barak, Sasan ;
Dahooei, Jalil Heidary .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 73 :134-149
[10]   Anaesthetists' intentions to violate safety guidelines [J].
Beatty, PCW ;
Beatty, SF .
ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (06) :528-540