Effects of Varicocele on Serum Testosterone and Changes of Testosterone After Varicocelectomy: A Prospective Controlled Study

被引:56
作者
Abdel-Meguid, Taha A. [1 ]
Farsi, Hasan M.
Al-Sayyad, Ahmad
Tayib, Abdulmalik
Mosli, Hisham A.
Halawani, Abdulghafour H.
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
INFERTILE MEN; MICROSURGICAL VARICOCELECTOMY; LEYDIG-CELL; REPAIR; PLASMA; SEMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To examine the hypotheses that clinical varicoceles affect baseline serum total testosterone levels (T) and varicocelectomy improves T. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study involved 4 groups of adult men. Varicocele-infertile treatment group (VIT) included 66 men who underwent varicocelectomy. Thirty-three varicocele-infertile control men (VIC) and 33 varicocele-fertile control men (VFC) were only observed. Normal-control (NC) group included 33 fertile men without varicocele. Varicocele groups were stratified into baseline hypogonadal (T <300 ng/dL) or eugonadal (T >= 300 ng/dL) subgroups. Main outcome measurements were between-group baseline T differences; and within-group T changes at 6- and 12-month follow-ups of men with varicocele. P <. 05 was considered significant. RESULTS Means (standard deviations) of baseline T in VIT, VIC, VFC, and NC were 347.4 (132.1), 339.7 (125.8), 396.6 (164.9), and 504.8 (149.7) ng/dL, respectively. The baseline T levels of varicocele groups were comparable, whereas they were significantly low compared with NC group. At 6-month follow-up, VIT demonstrated significant T improvements (mean change = 44.7 ng/dL; 12.9%; P < .0001). T changes were more remarkable among baseline hypogonadals (mean change = 93.7 ng/dL; 40.1%; P < .0001) compared with eugonadals (mean change = 8.6 ng/dL; 2.01%; P = .1223). These improvements were persistent at 12-month follow-up. Contrariwise, VIC and VFC exhibited nonsignificant T changes. Postvaricocelectomy T changes correlated significantly and inversely with baseline T (r = -0.689; P < .0001). This correlation was stronger and more significant among hypogonadals (r = -0.528; P = .004) than eugonadals (r = -0.400; P = .013). T improvements also exhibited significant positive correlations with preoperative and postoperative sperm concentrations. CONCLUSION Baseline T was significantly low in men with varicocele compared with normal men. Varicocelectomy yielded significant T improvements among hypogonadal men but insignificant changes in eugonadals. T changes correlated strongly and significantly with baseline T and sperm concentrations. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1087
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
PIRKE KM, 1983, ANDROLOGIA, V15, P637
[22]  
RABOCH J, 1971, FERTIL STERIL, V22, P152
[23]  
SAID SA, 1992, FERTIL STERIL, V57, P1289
[24]  
SIRVENT JJ, 1990, EUR UROL, V17, P257
[25]   Does Varicocelectomy Improve Gonadal Function in Men with Hypogonadism and Infertility? Analysis of a Prospective Study [J].
Srini, Vasan Sathya ;
Veerachari, Srinivas Belur .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2011, 2011
[26]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VARICOCELE SIZE AND RESPONSE TO VARICOCELECTOMY [J].
STECKEL, J ;
DICKER, AP ;
GOLDSTEIN, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (04) :769-771
[27]   THE EFFECT OF VARICOCELECTOMY ON SERUM TESTOSTERONE LEVELS IN INFERTILE MEN WITH VARICOCELES [J].
SU, LM ;
GOLDSTEIN, M ;
SCHLEGEL, PN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (05) :1752-1755
[28]   Varicocele as a risk factor for androgen deficiency and effect of repair [J].
Tanrikut, Cigdem ;
Goldstein, Marc ;
Rosoff, James S. ;
Lee, Richard K. ;
Nelson, Christian J. ;
Mulhall, John P. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (09) :1480-1484
[29]   Varicocele repair for treatment of androgen deficiency [J].
Tanrikut, Cigdem ;
Goldstein, Marc .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2010, 20 (06) :500-502
[30]   Impact of Varicocelectomy on Gonadal and Erectile Functions in Men with Hypogonadism and Infertility [J].
Zohdy, Wael ;
Ghazi, Sherif ;
Arafa, Mohamad .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (03) :885-893