Applicability of different ground-motion prediction models for northern Iran

被引:34
作者
Zafarani, H. [1 ]
Mousavi, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] IIEES, Tehran, Iran
[2] Arak Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, Arak, Iran
关键词
Ground-motion prediction equations; Evaluation of fitness; Ranking; PSHA; Northern Iran; SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS; AVERAGE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT; SOUTH CASPIAN BASIN; ACTIVE TECTONICS; BARRIER MODEL; ZAGROS REGION; EQUATIONS; EARTHQUAKE; SELECTION; ALBORZ;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-014-1151-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
A total of 163 free-field acceleration time histories recorded at epicentral distances of up to 200 km from 32 earthquakes with moment magnitudes ranging from M (w) 4.9 to 7.4 have been used to investigate the predictive capabilities of the local, regional, and next generation attenuation (NGA) ground-motion prediction equations and determine their applicability for northern Iran. Two different statistical approaches, namely the likelihood method (LH) of Scherbaum et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:341-348, 2004) and the average log-likelihood method (LLH) of Scherbaum et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3234-3247, 2009), have been applied for evaluation of these models. The best-fitting models (considering both the LH and LLH results) over the entire frequency range of interest are those of Ghasemi et al. (Seismol 13:499-515, 2009a) and Soghrat et al. (Geophys J Int 188:645-679, 2012) among the local models, Abrahamson and Silva (Earthq Spectra 24:67-97, 2008) and Chiou and Youngs (Earthq Spectra 24:173-215, 2008) among the NGA models, and finally Akkar and Bommer (Seism Res Lett 81:195-206, 2010) among the regional models.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1228
页数:30
相关论文
共 73 条
[21]   Shear wave velocity modelling in crustal rock for seismic hazard analysis [J].
Chandler, AM ;
Lam, NTK ;
Tsang, HH .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2005, 25 (02) :167-185
[22]  
CHANDRA U, 1979, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V69, P237
[23]   An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra [J].
Chiou, Brian S. -J. ;
Youngs, Robert R. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :173-215
[24]   Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: Application to Central Europe and rock sites [J].
Cotton, Fabrice ;
Scherbaum, Frank ;
Bommer, Julian J. ;
Bungum, Hilmar .
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2006, 10 (02) :137-156
[25]   Information-Theoretic Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Applicability Study Using Californian Data [J].
Delavaud, Elise ;
Scherbaum, Frank ;
Kuehn, Nicolas ;
Riggelsen, Carsten .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 99 (06) :3248-3263
[26]   An investigation of analysis of variance as a tool for exploring regional differences in strong ground motions [J].
Douglas, J .
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2004, 8 (04) :485-496
[27]  
Douglas J., 2004, 13 WORLD C EARTHQ EN
[28]  
Douglas J, 2011, RP59356FR BUR RECH G
[29]   Selection and ranking of ground motion models for seismic hazard analysis in the Pyrenees [J].
Drouet, Stephane ;
Scherbaum, Frank ;
Cotton, Fabrice ;
Souriau, Annie .
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2007, 11 (01) :87-100
[30]   Relocation and assessment of seismicity in the Iran region [J].
Engdahl, E. Robert ;
Jackson, James A. ;
Myers, Stephen C. ;
Bergman, Eric A. ;
Priestley, Keith .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 167 (02) :761-778