Tools for the assessment of hydrological ensemble forecasts obtained by neural networks

被引:48
作者
Boucher, Marie-Amelie [1 ]
Perreault, Luc [2 ]
Anctil, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Civil Engn, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] IREQ, Varennes, PQ J3X 1S1, Canada
关键词
continuous ranked probability score; hydrological ensemble forecasts; neural networks; stacking; PREDICTION SYSTEMS; DEBIASING FORECASTS; SCORING RULES; MODEL; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.2166/hydro.2009.037
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The increasing demand for uncertainty assessment in streamflow forecasts has drawn the hydrological community's interest toward ensemble forecasting techniques. The widespread deterministic hydrological forecasting point of view focuses to a great extent on the search for a hydrological model that would come as close as possible to "perfection" (i.e. the aim is to implement a model that produces a point forecast that is as close as possible as the observed outcome). On the other hand, ensemble forecasting departs from the deterministic point of view by avoiding the assumption that the "perfect" model exists and instead focuses on issuing a type of forecast that accounts explicitly for the uncertainty inherent to the forecasting process as a whole. In this paper, one-day-ahead hydrological ensemble forecasts obtained by stacked neural networks are presented and analysed. To do so, three simple performance assessment criteria are presented. Those criteria were originally developed in the meteorological and statistical communities to accommodate the need for a quality assessment methodology that is coherent with the probabilistic nature of ensemble weather forecasts. It will be shown that, even though the ensemble forecasts suffer from underdispersion, they outperform point forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 307
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Generalisation for neural networks through data sampling and training procedures, with applications to streamflow predictions [J].
Anctil, F ;
Lauzon, N .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (05) :940-958
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SURVEY COMMON VERIFI
[3]   Randomizing outputs to increase prediction accuracy [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2000, 40 (03) :229-242
[4]  
Brier Glenn W, 1950, Monthly weather review, V78, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078, 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:vofeit>2.0.co
[5]  
2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO
[6]  
2, 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078()0001:VOFEIT()2.0.CO
[7]  
2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)0782.0.CO
[8]  
2]
[9]   A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems [J].
Buizza, R ;
Houtekamer, PL ;
Toth, Z ;
Pellerin, G ;
Wei, MZ ;
Zhu, YJ .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (05) :1076-1097
[10]   Verification of an ensemble prediction system against observations [J].
Candille, G. ;
Cote, C. ;
Houtekamer, P. L. ;
Pellerin, G. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2007, 135 (07) :2688-2699