Comparison between the application of microcoil and hookwire for localizing pulmonary nodules

ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of localization of small pulmonary nodules with microcoil and hookwire prior to surgical resection.MethodsA total of 112 patients who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization of small pulmonary nodules were enrolled in this single-center retrospective non-randomized cohort study between June 2016 and June 2017. Seventy-nine patients who underwent percutaneous localization with microcoils formed the microcoil group; the remaining 33 patients underwent percutaneous localization with hookwires (hookwire group). The primary outcomes were the success and complication rates of the procedure. Student's t test was used for continuous variables, whereas chi-square analysis and logistic regression were used for dichotomous variables.ResultsVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was successfully performed in all cases, without conversion to thoracotomy. The localization success rate was 94.9% (75/79) in the microcoil group and 93.9% (31/33) in the hookwire group (p=0.836). Hookwire group (p=0.000) and nodule location of the lower lobe (p=0.012) were associated with an increased incidence of pneumothorax. Hookwire group (p=0.027) and decreased nodule diameter (p=0.024) were associated with an increased incidence of moderate to severe chest pain, as well as an increased incidence of overall complications.ConclusionsAlthough the deployment of the microcoil was more complex and required more time than hookwire placement, microcoil localization was associated with fewer complications.Key Points center dot CT-guided percutaneous localization using a microcoil and that using a hookwire are equally effective for localizing small pulmonary nodules prior to resection with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.center dot Lung nodule localization using a microcoil was associated with fewer complications than localization using a hookwire.