Governance interactions in small-scale fisheries market chains: Examples from the Asia-Pacific

被引:18
作者
Steenbergen, Dirk J. [1 ]
Fabinyi, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Barclay, Kate [2 ]
Song, Andrew M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cohen, Philippa J. [5 ]
Eriksson, Hampus [5 ]
Mills, David J. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Australian Natl Ctr Ocean Resources & Secur, Squires Way, North Wollongong, NSW 2000, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Broadway, NSW, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[4] WorldFish Solomon Isl, Honiara, Solomon Islands
[5] WorldFish, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia
[6] WorldFish Timor Leste, Dili, Timor-Leste
关键词
fisheries trade; governability; interactive governance; Solomon Islands; the Philippines; Timor-Leste; FOOD SECURITY; POPULATION-DENSITY; COMANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; FISH; COASTAL; COMMUNITY; IMPACT; INSTITUTIONS; PHILIPPINES;
D O I
10.1111/faf.12370
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Small-scale fisheries are subject to various governing institutions operating at different levels with different objectives. At the same time, small-scale fisheries increasingly form part of domestic and international market chains, with consequent effects for marine environments and livelihoods of the fishery-dependent. Yet there remains a need to better understand how small-scale fisheries market chains interact with the range of governance institutions that influence them. In this paper, we examine how multiple governance systems function along market chains, in order to identify opportunities for improved multiscale governance. We use three small-scale fisheries with varying local to global market chains operating in the Asia-Pacific region to develop a framework for analysis. Drawing from Interactive Governance theory we identify governing systems that have come to operate at particular sections in each market chain. We recognize four institutions that shape the governance over the length of the chain; namely those centred on (a) government, (b) private sector and pricing, (c) decentralized multistakeholder management and (d) culture and social relations. The framework shows how diverse arrangements of these governing institutions emerge and take effect along market chains. In doing so, we seek to move away from prescribed "ideals" of universal governing arrangements for fisheries and their market chains, and instead illuminate how governing systems function interactively across multiple scales.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 714
页数:18
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[2]   No-take marine reserves and reef fisheries management in the Philippines: A new people power revolution [J].
Alcala, Angel C. ;
Russ, Garry R. .
AMBIO, 2006, 35 (05) :245-254
[3]  
Alonso Poblacion E., 2012, POLICY PRACTICE RECO
[4]  
Alonso Poblacion E., 2013, STRENGTHENING ORG CO, P301
[5]   Fisheries and food security in Timor-Leste: the effects of ritual meat exchanges and market chains on fishing [J].
Alonso Poblacion, Enrique .
FOOD SECURITY, 2013, 5 (06) :807-816
[6]   Narrative assemblages for power-balanced coastal and marine governance. Tara Bandu as a tool for community-based fisheries co-management in Timor-Leste [J].
Alonso-Poblacion, Enrique ;
Rodrigues, Pedro ;
Wilson, Crispen ;
Pereira, Mario ;
Lee, Robert Ulric .
MARITIME STUDIES, 2018, 17 (01) :55-67
[7]  
AMSAT International, 2011, REP FISH LIV BAS SUR
[8]  
Andersen A. J., 2013, FOOD NUTR SECURITY T, P15
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Timor Leste strategic development plan 2011-2030: version submitted to the national government
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme for South and Southeast Asia (GCP/RAS/237/SPA) Field Project Document 2011/TIM/02