Optimum superheat utilization of extraction steam in double reheat ultra-supercritical power plants

被引:49
作者
Xu, Gang [1 ]
Zhou, Luyao [1 ]
Zhao, Shifei [1 ]
Liang, Feifei [1 ]
Xu, Cheng [1 ]
Yang, Yongping [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Natl Thermal Power Engn & Technol Res Ctr, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Double reheat; Superheat utilization; Thermodynamic analyses; Techno-economic analyses; Partial load conditions; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HEAT-RECOVERY; PERFORMANCES; GENERATION; SIMULATION; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.027
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Double reheat ultra-supercritical power plants have been receiving an increasing amount of attention because of their high thermal efficiency. However, the superheat degree of extraction steam in double reheat power plants is relatively high and results in a large temperature difference in the heat transfer process of the regenerative system. As a result, this impedes further improvement of the thermal efficiency of double reheat power plants. This paper presents two superheat utilization schemes of extraction steam in a double reheat ultra-supercritical power plant, where one scheme adopts outer steam coolers and the other employs a regenerative turbine. A comparative study of the two proposed schemes is conducted. Thermodynamic and techno-economic analyses are performed to reveal the energy saving effects of the proposed schemes. Thermodynamic analyses under partial load operation conditions are also presented. The results reveal the following. The power generation efficiency of the outer steam cooler scheme and the regenerative turbine scheme increases by 0.16 percentage points and 0.67 percentage points compared with a reference double reheat power plant, respectively. When the load is reduced, the energy saving effects of the proposed schemes become more obvious. The power generation efficiency increments of the outer steam cooler and the regenerative turbine schemes can reach 0.19 and 0.79 percentage points, respectively, at a 50% turbine heat acceptance load. The net annual revenues of the two schemes are 0.29 and 1.59 million USD, respectively. The results indicate that the two proposed schemes can both effectively utilize the superheat of extraction steam for double reheat ultra-supercritical power plants. In comparison, the regenerative turbine scheme is superior to the outer steam cooler scheme in terms of thermodynamic and techno-economic performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 872
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, STAT REV WORLD EN
[2]  
Blum R., 2007, EN SOL SUST DEV P
[3]   Hybrid geothermal-fossil electricity generation from low enthalpy geothermal resources: geothermal feedwater preheating in conventional power plants [J].
Bruhn, M .
ENERGY, 2002, 27 (04) :329-346
[4]   Integration of a chemical process model in a power plant modelling tool for the simulation of an amine based CO2 scrubber [J].
Cifre, P. Galindo ;
Brechtel, K. ;
Hoch, S. ;
Garcia, H. ;
Asprion, N. ;
Hasse, H. ;
Scheffknecht, G. .
FUEL, 2009, 88 (12) :2481-2488
[5]  
Department of Energy Statistics National Bureau of Statistics, 2011, CHINA ENERGY STAT YB
[6]  
Electric Power Planning and Design Institute, 2009, LIM DES REF COST IND LIM DES REF COST IND
[7]   Comparative energetic and exergetic performance analyses for coal-fired thermal power plants in Turkey [J].
Erdem, Hasan Huseyin ;
Akkaya, Ali Volkan ;
Cetin, Burhanettin ;
Dagdas, Ahmet ;
Sevilgen, Suleyman Hakan ;
Sahin, Bahri ;
Teke, Ismail ;
Gungor, Cengiz ;
Atas, Selcuk .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2009, 48 (11) :2179-2186
[8]   Combined hydrothermal carbonization and gasification of biomass with carbon capture [J].
Erlach, B. ;
Harder, B. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. .
ENERGY, 2012, 45 (01) :329-338
[9]  
Eskil Berg EE, 1924, POWER PLANT EC, V197, P727
[10]  
Feng WZ, 2014, EXPLORATION DEV GREE