Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

被引:7
作者
Daskaya, Hayrettin [1 ]
Yazici, Hasmet [2 ]
Dogan, Sedat [3 ]
Can, Ilknur Haberal [4 ]
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Anesthesia & Reanimat Clin, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Balikesir Univ, Fac Med, Ear Nose Throat Clin, TR-10000 Balikesir, Turkey
[3] Adiyaman Univ, Fac Med, Ear Nose Throat Clin, Adiyaman, Turkey
[4] Bagcilar Medipol Univ, Fac Med, Ear Nose Throat Clin, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Septoplasty; Cost analysis; Sedation anesthesia; General anesthesia; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 +/- A 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 +/- A 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 +/- A 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 +/- A 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.
引用
收藏
页码:2433 / 2436
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Unilateral hemiplegia: a unique complication of septoplasty
    D'Ascanio, L.
    Cappiello, L.
    Piazza, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2013, 127 (08) : 809 - 810
  • [2] Anaesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery
    Danielsen, A
    Gravningsbråten, R
    Olofsson, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 260 (09) : 481 - 486
  • [3] Comparison of local anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine sedation and general anaesthesia during septoplasty
    Dogan, Rafi
    Erbek, Selim
    Gonencer, Huseyin H.
    Erbek, H. Seyra
    Isbilen, Cengiz
    Arslan, Gulnaz
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (11) : 960 - 964
  • [4] Operative times, postanesthesia recovery times, and complications during sinonasal surgery using general anesthesia and local anesthesia with sedation
    Fedok, FG
    Ferraro, RE
    Kingsley, CP
    Fornadley, JA
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2000, 122 (04) : 560 - 566
  • [5] ANESTHETIC CHOICE FOR FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY
    FORNADLEY, JA
    KENNEDY, KS
    WILSON, JF
    GALANTICH, PT
    PARKER, GS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 1992, 6 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [6] COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY UNDER LOCAL AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA
    GITTELMAN, PD
    JACOBS, JB
    SKORINA, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1993, 102 (04) : 289 - 293
  • [7] Khwaja S, 2007, RHINOLOGY, V45, P83
  • [8] Monteiro Mário Luiz Ribeiro, 2006, Arq. Bras. Oftalmol., V69, P249, DOI 10.1590/S0004-27492006000200020
  • [9] Intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia for pediatric otolaryngology procedures
    Shiley, SG
    Lalwani, K
    Milczuk, HA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (06) : 637 - 641
  • [10] DAY-CASE SEPTAL SURGERY UNDER GENERAL-ANESTHESIA AND LOCAL-ANESTHESIA WITH SEDATION
    SRINIVASAN, V
    ARASARATNAM, RBS
    JANKELOWITZ, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1995, 109 (07) : 614 - 617