Post-industrial solidarity or meritocracy?

被引:0
作者
Andersen, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Roskilde Univ Ctr, Dept Social Sci, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The article deals with present forms of social and system integration and discusses what institutional reforms and new formations of actors and coalitions could counteract social exclusion in a way that takes post-industrial conditions into account. The term 'social exclusion' is primarily used in the European discourse, while the concept of an 'underclass' is normally used in the Anglo-Saxon discourse. These two discourses take very different approaches to what can be seen as the forces undermining societal harmony and social coherence. A paradox is identified between the rejection of class theory in most contemporary dominant social theory and the emergence of a new 'underclass'. It is argued that, today, the real missing link is the analysis of the growing power of elites. Whereas the underclass has been almost over-researched, the analysis of new elite formation, collective action, and coalition-building by powerful actors is almost absent. Therefore, the concept of social exclusion should be linked to the concept of social polarization.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 385
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] ANDERSON JA, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2484, P147, DOI 10.1117/12.213012
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, EMPOWERMENT POLITICS
  • [3] [Anonymous], URBAN POVERTY UNDERC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, PROBLEMS SOCIAL POLI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1964, EXPLORATIONS SOCIAL
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1982, The Underclass
  • [7] [Anonymous], SOCIAL INTEGRATION M
  • [8] Bell Daniel, 1973, The coming of post-Industrial society: A venture in social forecasting
  • [9] BLAKELY J, 1997, FORTRESS AM GATED CO
  • [10] Bourdieu P., 1987, BERKELEY J SOCIOL, V32, P1