A Computational Assessment of Target Engagement in the Treatment of Auditory Hallucinations with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

被引:15
作者
Lee, Won Hee [1 ]
Kennedy, Nigel I. [1 ]
Bikson, Marom [2 ]
Frangou, Sophia [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] CUNY City Coll, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10031 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2018年 / 9卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
auditory hallucinations; neuroimaging; computational modeling; transcranial direct current stimulation; schizophrenia; MAGNETIC SEIZURE THERAPY; VERBAL HALLUCINATIONS; ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY; QUANTITATIVE METAANALYSIS; BRAIN-STIMULATION; PRACTICAL GUIDE; TDCS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SAFETY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00048
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
We use auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) to illustrate the challenges in defining and assessing target engagement in the context of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for psychiatric disorders. We defined the target network as the cluster of regions of interest (ROIs) that are consistently implicated in AVH based on the conjunction of multimodal meta-analytic neuroimaging data. These were prescribed in the New York Head (a population derived model) and head models of four single individuals. We appraised two potential measures of target engagement, tDCS-induced peak electric field strength and tDCS-modulated volume defined as the percentage of the volume of the AVH network exposed to electric field magnitude stronger than the postulated threshold for neuronal excitability. We examined a left unilateral (LUL) montage targeting the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and temporoparietal junction (TPJ), a bilateral (BL) prefrontal montage, and a 2 x 1 montage targeting the left PFC and the TPJ bilaterally. Using computational modeling, we estimated the peak electric field strength and modulated volume induced by each montage for current amplitudes ranging 1-4 mA. We found that the LUL montage was inferior to both other montages in terms of peak electric field strength in right-sided AVH-ROIs. The BL montage was inferior to both other montages in terms of modulated volume of the left-sided AVH-ROIs. As the modulated volume is non-linear, its variability between montages reduced for current amplitudes above 3 mA. These findings illustrate how computational target engagement for tDCS can be tailored to specific networks and provide a principled approach for future study design.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Computational anatomy with the SPM software
    Ashburner, John
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (08) : 1163 - 1174
  • [2] Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bastani, A.
    Jaberzadeh, S.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (04) : 644 - 657
  • [3] Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016
    Bikson, Marom
    Grossman, Pnina
    Thomas, Chris
    Zannou, Adantchede Louis
    Jiang, Jimmy
    Adnan, Tatheer
    Mourdoukoutas, Antonios P.
    Kronberg, Greg
    Truong, Dennis
    Boggio, Paulo
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Charvet, Leigh
    Fregni, Felipe
    Fritsch, Brita
    Gillick, Bernadette
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Hampstead, Benjamin M.
    Jankord, Ryan
    Kirton, Adam
    Knotkova, Helena
    Liebetanz, David
    Liu, Anli
    Loo, Colleen
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Reis, Janine
    Richardson, Jessica D.
    Rotenberg, Alexander
    Turkeltaub, Peter E.
    Woods, Adam J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) : 641 - 661
  • [4] Examining Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) as a Treatment for Hallucinations in Schizophrenia
    Brunelin, Jerome
    Mondino, Marine
    Gassab, Leila
    Haesebaert, Frederic
    Gaha, Lofti
    Suaud-Chagny, Marie-Francoise
    Saoud, Mohamed
    Mechri, Anwar
    Poulet, Emmanuel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 169 (07) : 719 - 724
  • [5] Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions
    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Bolognini, Nadia
    Bikson, Marom
    Wagner, Tim
    Merabet, Lotfi
    Edwards, Dylan J.
    Valero-Cabre, Antoni
    Rotenberg, Alexander
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Ferrucci, Roberta
    Priori, Alberto
    Boggio, Paulo Sergio
    Fregni, Felipe
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2012, 5 (03) : 175 - 195
  • [6] Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study
    Chhatbar, Pratik Y.
    Chen, Rong
    Deardorff, Rachael
    Dellenbach, Blair
    Kautz, Steven A.
    George, Mark S.
    Feng, Wuwei
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (03) : 553 - 559
  • [7] Datta Abhishek, 2012, Front Psychiatry, V3, P91, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00091
  • [8] Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields
    Deans, Jacqueline K.
    Powell, Andrew D.
    Jefferys, John G. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2007, 583 (02): : 555 - 565
  • [9] The effect of the interval-between-sessions on prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dedoncker, Josefien
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Baeken, Chris
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2016, 123 (10) : 1159 - 1172
  • [10] Reproducibility of brain activation during auditory verbal hallucinations
    Diederen, K. M. J.
    Charbonnier, L.
    Neggers, S. F. W.
    van Lutterveld, R.
    Daalman, K.
    Slotema, C. W.
    Kahn, R. S.
    Sommer, I. E. C.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2013, 146 (1-3) : 320 - 325