Decoding "Us" and "Them": Neural Representations of Generalized Group Concepts

被引:40
作者
Cikara, Mina [1 ]
Van Bavel, Jay J. [2 ]
Ingbretsen, Zachary A. [1 ]
Lau, Tatiana [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
intergroup relations; social categories; functional magnetic resonance imaging; multi-voxel pattern analysis; ROSTROLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SOCIAL COGNITION; NEUROSCIENCE; BRAIN; RACE; INFORMATION; PAIN; PERSPECTIVE; MECHANISMS; SIMILARITY;
D O I
10.1037/xge0000287
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Humans form social coalitions in every society on earth, yet we know very little about how the general concepts us and them are represented in the brain. Evolutionary psychologists have argued that the human capacity for group affiliation is a byproduct of adaptations that evolved for tracking coalitions in general. These theories suggest that humans possess a common neural code for the concepts in-group and out-group, regardless of the category by which group boundaries are instantiated. The authors used multivoxel pattern analysis to identify the neural substrates of generalized group concept representations. They trained a classifier to encode how people represented the most basic instantiation of a specific social group (i.e., arbitrary teams created in the lab with no history of interaction or associated stereotypes) and tested how well the neural data decoded membership along an objectively orthogonal, real-world category (i.e., political parties). The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/middle cingulate cortex and anterior insula were associated with representing groups across multiple social categories. Restricting the analyses to these regions in a separate sample of participants performing an explicit categorization task, the authors replicated cross-categorization classification in anterior insula. Classification accuracy across categories was driven predominantly by the correct categorization of in-group targets, consistent with theories indicating in-group preference is more central than out-group derogation to group perception and cognition. These findings highlight the extent to which social group concepts rely on domain-general circuitry associated with encoding stimuli's functional significance.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 631
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping
    Amodio, David M.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 15 (10) : 670 - 682
  • [2] Ingroup Favoritism in Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis
    Balliet, Daniel
    Wu, Junhui
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (06) : 1556 - 1581
  • [3] Empathy and Pro-Social Behavior in Rats
    Bartal, Inbal Ben-Ami
    Decety, Jean
    Mason, Peggy
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 334 (6061) : 1427 - 1430
  • [4] Brown D. E, 1991, Human universals
  • [5] Left, but not right, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex meets a stringent test of the relational integration hypothesis
    Bunge, Silvia A.
    Helskog, Espen Hauk
    Wendelken, Carter
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 46 (01) : 338 - 342
  • [6] COMMON FATE, SIMILARITY, AND OTHER INDEXES OF THE STATUS OF AGGREGATES OF PERSONS AS SOCIAL ENTITIES
    CAMPBELL, DT
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1958, 3 (01): : 14 - 25
  • [7] Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning
    Christoff, K
    Prabhakaran, V
    Dorfman, J
    Zhao, Z
    Kroger, JK
    Holyoak, KJ
    Gabrieli, JDE
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (05) : 1136 - 1149
  • [8] Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses
    Cikara, M.
    Bruneau, E.
    Van Bavel, J. J.
    Saxe, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 55 : 110 - 125
  • [9] The Neuroscience of Intergroup Relations An Integrative Review
    Cikara, Mina
    Van Bavel, Jay J.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (03) : 245 - 274
  • [10] Perceptions of race
    Cosmides, L
    Tooby, J
    Kurzban, R
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (04) : 173 - 179