Effects of Changes in the Frankfort Horizontal Plane Definition on the Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Evaluation of Symmetry

被引:6
|
作者
Mangal, Utkarsh [1 ]
Hwang, Jae Joon [2 ]
Jo, Heon [1 ]
Lee, Sung Min [3 ]
Jung, Yun-Hoa [2 ]
Cho, Bong-Hae [2 ]
Cha, Jung-Yul [1 ,4 ]
Choi, Sung-Hwan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Inst Craniofacial Deform, Dept Orthodont, Coll Dent, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Inst Translat Dent Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Yangsan 50612, South Korea
[3] HDXWILL, Seoul 03162, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, PLUS Project BK21, Seoul 03722, South Korea
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 22期
关键词
FH plane; cone-beam computed tomography; CBCT; facial asymmetry; imaging; three-dimensional; ASYMMETRY; LANDMARKS; DEVIATION; ACCURACY; LINE;
D O I
10.3390/app10227956
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The plane formed by the intersection of bilateral porions (PoR and PoL) and left orbitale (OrL) is conventionally defined as the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane. We aim to test the influence of the FH plane definition on a 3D cephalometric assessment. We selected 38 adult patients (20 males, 18 females; average age: 22.87 +/- 5.17 years) without any gross asymmetry from retrospective records and traced and analyzed their cone-beam computed tomographic images. The findings were categorized into the following four groups: FH1: conventional; FH2: PoR, PoL, right orbitale (OrR); FH3: OrR, OrL, PoL; FH4: OrR, OrL, PoR. The average menton (Me) deviation from the MSP was statistically significant for the FH1 group (0.56 +/- 0.27 mm; p < 0.001), compared to the FH3 (1.37 +/- 1.23 mm) and FH4 (1.33 +/- 1.16 mm) groups. The spatial orientation level (SOL) of the FH plane showed a marked difference (p < 0.05) between the FH2 (0.602 degrees +/- 0.503 degrees) and FH4 (0.944 degrees +/- 0.778 degrees) groups. The SOL of the MSP was comparatively small (p < 0.001) for FH2 (0.015 degrees +/- 0.023 degrees) in comparison to both FH 3 (0.644 degrees +/- 0.546 degrees) and FH 4 (0.627 degrees +/- 0.516 degrees). Therefore, the FH plane definition can significantly influence the interpretation of cephalometric findings. Future studies should focus on standardization to improve the reliability and reproducibility of 3D cephalometry.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks
    Dot, Gauthier
    Rafflenbeul, Frederic
    Kerbrat, Adeline
    Rouch, Philippe
    Gajny, Laurent
    Schouman, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [2] Influence of different setups of the Frankfort horizontal plane on 3-dimensional cephalometric measurements
    Goncalves dos Santos, Rodrigo Mologni
    De Martino, Jose Mario
    Haiter Neto, Francisco
    Passeri, Luis Augusto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (02) : 242 - 249
  • [3] Frankfort horizontal plane is an appropriate three-dimensinal reference in the evaluation of clinical and skeletal cant
    Oh, Suseok
    Ahn, Jaemyung
    Nam, Ki-Uk
    Paeng, Jun-Young
    Hong, Jongrak
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2013, 39 (02) : 71 - 76
  • [4] Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull
    Neelapu, Bala Chakravarthy
    Kharbanda, Om Prakash
    Sardana, Viren
    Gupta, Abhishek
    Vasamsetti, Srikanth
    Balachandran, Rajiv
    Sardana, Harish Kumar
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (02)
  • [5] Three-dimensional evaluation of morphologic tooth symmetry in various malocclusions
    Dindaroglu, Furkan
    Duran, Gokhan Serhat
    Aras, Isil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 150 (03) : 459 - 466
  • [6] The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study
    Li, Chenshuang
    Teixeira, Hellen
    Tanna, Nipul
    Zheng, Zhong
    Chen, Stephanie Hsiang Yi
    Zou, Min
    Chung, Chun-Hsi
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [7] Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking
    Dot, G.
    Rafflenbeul, F.
    Arbotto, M.
    Gajny, L.
    Rouch, P.
    Schouman, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (10) : 1367 - 1378
  • [8] Computerized three-dimensional cephalometric template for Thai adults
    Duangsuwan, Jeenarat
    Raocharernporn, Somchart
    Thiradilok, Sasipa
    Manopatanakul, Somchai
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (04)
  • [9] Visual pathway-related horizontal reference plane for three-dimensional craniofacial analysis
    Kang, Y. H.
    Kim, B. C.
    Park, K. R.
    Yon, J. Y.
    Kim, H. J.
    Tak, H. J.
    Piao, Z.
    Kim, M. K.
    Lee, S. H.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2012, 15 (04) : 245 - 254
  • [10] Construction and Validation of the Midsagittal Reference Plane Based on the Skull Base Symmetry for Three- Dimensional Cephalometric Craniofacial Analysis
    Kim, Hak-Jin
    Kim, Bong Chul
    Kim, Jin-Geun
    Zhengguo, Piao
    Kang, Sang Hoon
    Lee, Sang-Hwy
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (02) : 338 - 342