Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size

被引:21
作者
Otani, Tomoaki [1 ,2 ]
Hosono, Makoto [3 ]
Kanagaki, Mitsunori [1 ]
Onishi, Yasuyuki [1 ]
Matsubara, Naoko [1 ]
Kawabata, Kazuna [1 ]
Kimura, Hiroyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki Gen Med Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 2-17-77 Higashinaniwa Cho, Amagasaki, Hyogo 6608550, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Nucl Med, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Kindai Univ, Fac Med, Inst Adv Clin Med, Osaka, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Bayesian penalized likelihood; image reconstruction; PET; Q; Clear; PULMONARY NODULES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.18.20478
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to characterize the Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm in comparison with an ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithm and to determine its optimal penalization factor (expressed as a beta value) for clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS. FDG PET/CT scans of 46 patients with lung cancer were reconstructed using OSEM and BPL with beta values of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 1000. The liver signal-to-noise ratio, mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of the liver, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and SUVmean of the cancers were measured. Tumors were categorized into three size groups, and the percentage difference in the tumor SUVmax between OSEM and BPL with a beta value of 200 as well as the percentage difference in the SUVmax between BPL with a beta value of 200 and BPL with a beta value of 1000 were calculated. Image quality was assessed by visual scoring. RESULTS. BPL showed a significantly higher liver signal-to-noise ratio than OSEM, except for BPL with a beta value of 200. The liver SUVmean showed no statistical difference among all algorithms. The SUVmax and SUVmean of tumors decreased as the beta value increased. BPL with a beta value of 200 produced a significantly higher tumor SUVmax than did OSEM (p < 0.01), and BPL with a beta value of 400, 500, or 1000 produced a significantly lower tumor SUVmax than did OSEM (p < 0.01). Visual analysis showed the highest and lowest scores for BPL with beta values of 500 and 200, respectively. In the small size group, the percentage difference in the SUVmax between OSEM and BPL with a beta value of 200 and the percentage difference in the SUVmax between BPL with a beta value of 200 and BPL with a beta value of 1000 were significantly larger than that in the other size groups (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. The BPL algorithm improves image quality without compromising image quantification. A beta value of 500 appeared to be optimal in this study. Smaller tumors were more influenced by BPL.
引用
收藏
页码:W50 / W56
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements
    Adams, Michael C.
    Turkington, Timothy G.
    Wilson, Joshua M.
    Wong, Terence Z.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) : 310 - 320
  • [2] Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET
    Ahn, Sangtae
    Ross, Steven G.
    Asma, Evren
    Miao, Jun
    Jin, Xiao
    Cheng, Lishui
    Wollenweber, Scott D.
    Manjeshwar, Ravindra M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (15) : 5733 - 5751
  • [3] BAUMER A, 2015, J NUCL MED S3, V56
  • [4] 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response
    Ben-Haim, Simona
    Ell, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 (01) : 88 - 99
  • [5] Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis
    Boellaard, Ronald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 : 11S - 20S
  • [6] Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0
    Fukukita, Hiroyoshi
    Senda, Michio
    Terauchi, Takashi
    Suzuki, Kazufumi
    Daisaki, Hiromitsu
    Matsumoto, Keiichi
    Ikari, Yasuhiko
    Hayashi, Masuo
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (04) : 325 - 334
  • [7] Comparison of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction versus OS-EM for characterization of small pulmonary nodules in oncologic PET/CT
    Howard, Brandon A.
    Morgan, Rustain
    Thorpe, Matthew P.
    Turkington, Timothy G.
    Oldan, Jorge
    James, Olga G.
    Borges-Neto, Salvador
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (08) : 623 - 628
  • [8] ACCELERATED IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION USING ORDERED SUBSETS OF PROJECTION DATA
    HUDSON, HM
    LARKIN, RS
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1994, 13 (04) : 601 - 609
  • [9] ISHIMORI T, 2017, J NUCL MED S1, V58
  • [10] Jaskowiak CJ, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P424