A technology-enabled assessment and attainment of desirable competencies

被引:5
作者
Jadhav, Abhijitkumar Anandrao [1 ]
Suryawanshi, Deepali Anandrao [2 ]
Ahankari, Sandeep Sureshrao [3 ]
Zope, Sanjay Bhaskar [4 ]
机构
[1] Annasaheb Dange Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Ashta, Sangli 416301, Maharashtra, India
[2] Annasaheb Dange Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Ashta, Sangli 416301, Maharashtra, India
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Tiruvalam Rd, Katpadi 632014, Tamilnadu, India
[4] Sahyadri Valley Coll Engn & Technol, Kalyan Ahmednagar Highway, Pune 412411, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Outcomes; Competencies; Outcome-based assessment; Assessment tools; Pedagogy; Accreditation; HIGHER-EDUCATION; OUTCOMES; RUBRICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ece.2022.02.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Engineering is an exciting field, offering exceptional career opportunities. Still, the success of an engineering graduate depends upon their knowledge, skills, and attitude. Accreditation agencies worldwide described these attributes as desirable competencies referred to as program outcomes (POs) by NBA, India. These POs are imparted during graduation and effectively implemented in the profession. Thus, continuous monitoring of each PO for an individual undergraduate during graduation becomes vital to initiate corrective action (if needed). This study proposes automation in the assessment process for POs. It has identified new assessment events and developed additional online assessment tools, feedback systems involving all stakeholders. To demonstrate the effect/impact of all these parameters, separate mathematical formulae are evolved to assess each PO. The authors claim that the developed system provides a more realistic attainment number due to comprehensive assessment and all-inclusive feedback instead of relying on sample data as in the conventional assessment process. It also helps in institutional accreditation.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 83
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   Reduced performance on examinations following untimed short assessments [J].
Kennedy, Ann Blair ;
Fiester, Steven E. .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2020, 65
[22]  
Kinghorn A, 1991, Nurse Educ Today, V11, P310, DOI 10.1016/0260-6917(91)90095-R
[23]   Rethinking higher education and its relationship with social inequalities: Past knowledge, present state and future potential [J].
Kromydas T. .
Palgrave Communications, 3 (1)
[24]   Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis [J].
Machts, Nils ;
Kaiser, Johanna ;
Schmidt, Fabian T. C. ;
Moeller, Jens .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 19 :85-103
[25]  
Madheswari S. P., 2020, Procedia Computer Science, V172, P215, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PROCS.2020.05.034
[26]  
Manimala M., 2020, Vikalpa, V45, P7, DOI DOI 10.1177/0256090920917263
[27]  
Marg B.P, 2015, SELF ASSESSMENT REPO, V91, P1
[28]   The Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Australia: Finding the Holy Grail [J].
Martin, Linley ;
Mahat, Marian .
AERA OPEN, 2017, 3 (01)
[29]   Universities and the post-2015 development agenda: an analytical framework [J].
McCowan, Tristan .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 72 (04) :505-523
[30]   Achievements, outcomes and proposal for global accreditation of engineering education in developing countries [J].
Memon, Javed A. ;
Demirdogen, R. Esra ;
Chowdhry, B. S. .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES - NEW TRENDS AND ISSUES IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, 1 (01) :2557-2561