Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation

被引:76
|
作者
Bryant, Amy G. [1 ]
Narasimhan, Subasri [1 ]
Bryant-Comstock, Katelyn [2 ]
Levi, Erika E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Crisis pregnancy center; Abortion; Misinformation; Abortion restrictions; MENTAL-HEALTH; INDUCED-ABORTION; ASSOCIATION; REANALYSIS; STIGMA; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Most states with 24-h waiting periods prior to abortion provide state resource directories to women seeking abortion. Our objective was to evaluate the information on abortion provided on the websites of crisis pregnancy centers listed in these resource directories. Study design: We performed a survey of the websites of crisis pregnancy centers referenced in state resource directories for pregnant women. We searched for these state-provided resource directories online. We contacted state Departments of Health and Human Services for a print copy when a directory could not be found online. The crisis pregnancy center websites were evaluated for the information provided on abortion. Standardized data collection tools were used. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results: Resource directories of 12 states were procured. A total of 254 websites referring to 348 crisis pregnancy centers were identified. Overall, a total of 203/254 [80%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 75%-84%] of websites provided at least one false or misleading piece of information. The most common misleading or false information included on the websites were a declared link between abortion and mental health risks (122/254 sites; 48%, 95% CI 42%-54%), preterm birth (54/254; 21%, 95% CI 17%-27%), breast cancer (51/254; 20%, 95% CI 16%-25%) and future infertility (32/254; 13%, 95% CI 9%-17%). Conclusion: Most crisis pregnancy centers listed in state resource directories for pregnant women provide misleading or false information regarding the risks of abortion. States should not list agencies that provide inaccurate information as resources in their directories. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 605
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Disinformation and climate crisis: Challenges and proposals for the future
    Magallon-rosa, Raul
    Sanchez-torres, Mabel
    CATALAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION & CULTURAL STUDIES, 2025, 16 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [42] Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis
    Allchin, Douglas
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2023, 107 (02) : 261 - 274
  • [43] Misinformation, disinformation, and fake news: lessons from an interdisciplinary, systematic literature review
    Broda, Elena
    Stromback, Jesper
    ANNALS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, 2024, 48 (02) : 139 - 166
  • [44] Artificial intelligence in the battle against disinformation and misinformation: a systematic review of challenges and approaches
    Saeidnia, Hamid Reza
    Hosseini, Elaheh
    Lund, Brady
    Tehrani, Maral Alipour
    Zaker, Sanaz
    Molaei, Saba
    KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2025, : 3139 - 3158
  • [45] Combating fake news, disinformation, and misinformation: Experimental evidence for media literacy education
    Adjin-Tettey, Theodora Dame
    COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [46] Fact-Checking Practices by Canadian Adults During an Era of Misinformation and Disinformation
    Cucinelli, Giuliana
    Farhan, Leelan
    GLOBAL MEDIA JOURNAL-CANADIAN EDITION, 2022, 14 (01): : 119 - 142
  • [47] Deception as a Bridging Concept in the Study of Disinformation, Misinformation, and Misperceptions: Toward a Holistic Framework
    Chadwick, Andrew
    Stanyer, James
    COMMUNICATION THEORY, 2022, 32 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [48] What is misinformation and disinformation? Understanding multi-stakeholders' perspectives in the Asia Pacific
    Gibbons, Andrew
    Carson, Andrea
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 57 (03) : 231 - 247
  • [49] Understanding the Influence of Web-Based Information, Misinformation, Disinformation, and Reinformation on COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Protocol for a Multicomponent Study
    Dube, Eve
    MacDonald, Shannon E.
    Manca, Terra
    Bettinger, Julie A.
    Driedger, S. Michelle
    Graham, Janice
    Greyson, Devon
    MacDonald, Noni E.
    Meyer, Samantha
    Roch, Genevieve
    Vivion, Maryline
    Aylsworth, Laura
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Gelinas-Gascon, Felix
    Sathler Guimaraes, Lucas Marques
    Hakim, Hina
    Gagnon, Dominique
    Bechard, Benoit
    Gramaccia, Julie A.
    Khoury, Richard
    Tremblay, Sebastien
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (10):
  • [50] Pregnant Women's Experiences of Crisis Pregnancy Centers: When Abortion Stigmatization Succeeds and Fails
    Kimport, Katrina
    SYMBOLIC INTERACTION, 2019, 42 (04) : 618 - 639