Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation

被引:79
作者
Bryant, Amy G. [1 ]
Narasimhan, Subasri [1 ]
Bryant-Comstock, Katelyn [2 ]
Levi, Erika E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Crisis pregnancy center; Abortion; Misinformation; Abortion restrictions; MENTAL-HEALTH; INDUCED-ABORTION; ASSOCIATION; REANALYSIS; STIGMA; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Most states with 24-h waiting periods prior to abortion provide state resource directories to women seeking abortion. Our objective was to evaluate the information on abortion provided on the websites of crisis pregnancy centers listed in these resource directories. Study design: We performed a survey of the websites of crisis pregnancy centers referenced in state resource directories for pregnant women. We searched for these state-provided resource directories online. We contacted state Departments of Health and Human Services for a print copy when a directory could not be found online. The crisis pregnancy center websites were evaluated for the information provided on abortion. Standardized data collection tools were used. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results: Resource directories of 12 states were procured. A total of 254 websites referring to 348 crisis pregnancy centers were identified. Overall, a total of 203/254 [80%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 75%-84%] of websites provided at least one false or misleading piece of information. The most common misleading or false information included on the websites were a declared link between abortion and mental health risks (122/254 sites; 48%, 95% CI 42%-54%), preterm birth (54/254; 21%, 95% CI 17%-27%), breast cancer (51/254; 20%, 95% CI 16%-25%) and future infertility (32/254; 13%, 95% CI 9%-17%). Conclusion: Most crisis pregnancy centers listed in state resource directories for pregnant women provide misleading or false information regarding the risks of abortion. States should not list agencies that provide inaccurate information as resources in their directories. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 605
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REP APA TASK FORC ME
[2]   Shortcomings of health information on the Internet [J].
Benigeri, M ;
Pluye, P .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 18 (04) :381-386
[3]  
Beral V, 2004, LANCET, V363, P1007, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15835-2
[4]   Reproductive outcomes following induced abortion: a national register-based cohort study in Scotland [J].
Bhattacharya, Siladitya ;
Lowit, Alison ;
Bhattacharya, Sohinee ;
Raja, Edwin Amalraj ;
Lee, Amanda Jane ;
Mahmood, Tahir ;
Templeton, Allan .
BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (04)
[5]   Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina [J].
Bryant, Amy G. ;
Levi, Erika E. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (06) :752-756
[6]   Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995-2009 [J].
Coleman, Priscilla K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 199 (03) :180-186
[7]  
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012, OBSTET GYNECOL, V120, P964, DOI [DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E3182723B1B, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b]
[8]   POST-ABORTION SYNDROME: CREATING AN AFFLICTION [J].
Dadlez, E. M. ;
Andrews, William L. .
BIOETHICS, 2010, 24 (09) :445-452
[9]  
Harris LH, 2012, OBSTET GYNECOL, V120, P1472, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723d82, http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723d82]
[10]   ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE - ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION [J].
HILL, AB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1965, 58 (05) :295-+