Saving assessment using the PERS in solar power towers

被引:15
作者
Rodriguez-Sanchez, M. R. [1 ]
Sanchez-Gonzalez, A. [1 ]
Marugan-Cruz, C. [1 ]
Santana, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Fluids & Thermal Engn, Energy Syst Engn Grp ISE, Madrid 28911, Spain
关键词
Solar power tower; Parasitic power consumption; Potential energy; Storage tanks; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; HELIOSTAT FIELD; PLANTS; RECEIVER; GENERATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.076
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The improvement of the solar power tower using solar salt is one of the main goals of researchers. Any method or invention to improve the efficiency of this technology contributes to promote the renewable energies. The use of a Potential Energy Recovery System (PERS) in two different solar power tower plants of 20 and 100 MW has been analysed. The PERS is formed, at least, by one turbine, located at the hot salt pipe coming from the receiver. The turbine is engaged to the shaft of the feed pump, which raises the heat transfer fluid from the cold tank to the receiver. It reduces the parasitic power consumption of the plant, and increases its global efficiency. Different PERS configurations have been modelled. Based on an energetic and economic analysis, the optimal configuration is a geometrical similar turbine of three times the volume flow rate of one feed pump. The PERS has been proven to be a cost reductive and clean tool. For a 100 MW power plant of 30-year lifetime the investment cost is 1.26 M$ and the annual cash flow is 0.89 M$, while for a plant of 20 MW these values are 0.26 M$ and 0.19 M$, respectively. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 819
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of dispatching scenarios for a multi-tower concentrating solar power plant in a Renewable Energy Community
    Rovense, Francesco
    Pinnarelli, Anna
    Gonzalez-Aguilar, Jose
    Romero, Manuel
    Brusco, Giovanni
    Vizza, Pasquale
    Menniti, Daniele
    Sorrentino, Nicola
    Dufour, Javier
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2025, 382
  • [42] Designing and exergetic analysis of a solar power tower system for Iskenderun region
    Yagli, Huseyin
    Karakus, Cuma
    Koc, Yildiz
    Cevik, Mehmet
    Ugurlu, Irem
    Koc, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2019, 28 (01) : 96 - 112
  • [43] Energy analysis of a particle suspension solar combined cycle power plant
    Rang, Qian
    Dewil, Raf
    Degreve, Jan
    Baeyens, Jan
    Zhang, Huili
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 163 : 292 - 303
  • [44] Optimization of solar aided coal-fired power plant layouts using multi-criteria assessment
    Zhu, Yong
    Pei, Jie
    Cao, Chuanzhao
    Zhai, Rongrong
    Yang, Yongping
    Reyes-Belmonte, M. A.
    Gonzalez-Aguilar, Jose
    Romero, Manuel
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 137 : 406 - 418
  • [45] Assessment of Capacity Factor and Dispatch Flexibility of Concentrated Solar Power Units
    Dallmer-Zerbe, Kilian
    Bucher, Matthias A.
    Ulbig, Andreas
    Andersson, Goran
    2013 IEEE GRENOBLE POWERTECH (POWERTECH), 2013,
  • [46] Robust design of hybrid solar power systems: Sustainable integration of concentrated solar power and photovoltaic technologies
    Furlan, Gabriele
    You, Fengqi
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 13
  • [47] Comparative Performance Assessment of a Hybrid Solar-Coal Power Plant
    Sunil, Baloda
    Soni, Manoj S.
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 3 (02) : 227 - 235
  • [48] Single Number Life Cycle Assessment of Space Based Solar Power
    Gigantino, Joshua
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS FOR SPACE AND EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS (WISEE), 2015,
  • [49] Economic potential to develop concentrating solar power in China: A provincial assessment
    Ji, Junping
    Tang, Hua
    Jin, Peng
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 114
  • [50] Solar Power Forecasting Using Deep Learning Techniques
    Elsaraiti, Meftah
    Merabet, Adel
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 31692 - 31698