Comprehensive evaluation of aerodynamic performance of twin-box girder bridges with vertical stabilizers

被引:34
作者
Zhou, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yongxin [2 ]
Ge, Yaojun [2 ]
Zhang, Lihai [3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Inst Urban Smart Transportat & Safety Maintenance, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Disaster Reduct Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Twin-box girder; Vertical central stabilizer; Stationary aerodynamic performance; Flutter performance; Vortex-induced vibration; Control effectiveness; LONG-SPAN BRIDGES; SUSPENSION BRIDGES; SUTONG BRIDGE; DESIGN; DECK; SIMULATION; FLUTTER; WINDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2018.01.039
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Although vertical central stabilizer (VCS) on long-span cable-supported bridges is one of practical passive aerodynamic countermeasures, the effectiveness of VCS in improving aerodynamic performance is much dependent on the parameters of VCS. Through a series of wind tunnel tests, in present study we investigated the influences of various combinations of six heights and two positions of VCS on three crucial aerodynamic performances (i.e. stationary aerodynamic performance, flutter performance and vortex-induced vibration (VIV) performance) of a twin-box girder suspension bridge. Results show that for the 20% slot width ratio (SWR) bridge, increasing the height of upward VCS (UVCS) has limited contribution to the improvement in stationary aerodynamic performance owing to the increase of drag force coefficient (C-D) and pitching moment coefficient (C-M). In addition, the critical flutter wind velocity initially increases with the height increase of VCS, and then significantly decreases after the height of VCS reaches to a certain threshold. Furthermore, the VIV displacement responses significantly become larger after installing higher UVCS and downward VCS (DVCS) from 0.6 h/1.1 to 1.0 h/H, especially for heaving VIV. Most importantly, the implementation of 0.2 h/H DVCS for the 20% SWR twin-box girder bridge could produce the best aerodynamic performance outcomes after comprehensive evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 327
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   On the mechanism of vertical stabilizer plates for improving aerodynamic stability of bridges [J].
Chen, AR ;
Zhou, ZY ;
Xiang, HF .
WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2006, 9 (01) :59-74
[2]   Nonlinear response analysis of long-span bridges under turbulent winds [J].
Chen, XZ ;
Kareem, A .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2001, 89 (14-15) :1335-1350
[3]   Aeroelastic analysis of bridges under multicorrelated winds: Integrated state-space approach [J].
Chen, XZ ;
Kareem, A .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2001, 127 (11) :1124-1134
[4]   Numerical study of a twin box bridge deck with increasing gap ratio by using RANS and LES approaches [J].
de Miranda, S. ;
Patruno, L. ;
Ricci, M. ;
Ubertini, F. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 99 :546-558
[5]   Wind tunnel tests and numerical approach for long span bridges: The Messina bridge [J].
Diana, G. ;
Fiammenghi, G. ;
Belloli, M. ;
Rocchi, D. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2013, 122 :38-49
[6]  
Garg V.K., 1984, DYNAMICS RAILWAY VEH
[7]  
Ge YJ, 2009, WIND STRUCT, V12, P285
[8]   Numerical simulation of wind effects: A probabilistic perspective [J].
Kareem, Ahsan .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (10-11) :1472-1497
[9]   AERODYNAMIC ASPECTS OF THE FINAL DESIGN OF THE 1624 M SUSPENSION BRIDGE ACROSS THE GREAT BELT [J].
LARSEN, A .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1993, 48 (2-3) :261-285
[10]   Dynamic wind effects on suspension and cable-stayed bridges [J].
Larsen, Allan ;
Larose, Guy L. .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2015, 334 :2-28