"TV no longer commands our full attention": Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news

被引:103
作者
Van Cauwenberge, Anna [1 ]
Schaap, Gabi [2 ]
van Roy, Rob [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Inst Media Studies, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Commun, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Media multitasking; Cognitive load; Limited capacity; News learning; Second-screen viewing; Computer mediated communication; MEDIA MULTITASKING; BACKGROUND TELEVISION; READING-COMPREHENSION; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; STUDENTS; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.021
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Second-screen viewing the use of smartphones, tablets, and laptops while watching television has increased dramatically in the last few years. Using multiple resource theory and threaded cognition theory, this study investigated the effects of second-screen viewing on cognitive load, factual recall and comprehension of news. Second, we examined the effects of relevant (i.e., looking up information related to the news story) and irrelevant (i.e., looking up information unrelated to the story) second-screen viewing on learning from news. Results from an experiment (N = 85) showed that second-screen viewing led to lower factual recall and comprehension of news content than single-screen viewing. These effects were mediated by cognitive load: second-screen viewing led to a higher cognitive load than single-screen viewing, with higher cognitive load, in turn, leading towards lower factual recall and comprehension of news content. Contrary to our expectations, we found no statistically significant differences between effects of relevant and irrelevant second-screen viewing. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 109
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Media Psychology, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0102_4, 10.1207/s1532785xmep0102_4, DOI 10.1207/S1532785XMEP01024]
[2]   Background television and reading memory in context -: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes [J].
Armstrong, GB ;
Chung, L .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (03) :327-352
[3]   MULTIPLE RESOURCE THEORY .1. APPLICATION TO TELEVISION VIEWING [J].
BASIL, MD .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (02) :177-207
[4]  
Bergen L, 2005, HUM COMMUN RES, V31, P311, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00874.x
[5]   Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading [J].
Bowman, Laura L. ;
Levine, Laura E. ;
Waite, Bradley M. ;
Gendron, Michael .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 54 (04) :927-931
[6]   Media Multitasking Behavior: Concurrent Television and Computer Usage [J].
Brasel, S. Adam ;
Gips, James .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2011, 14 (09) :527-534
[7]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131
[8]   Media Multitasking: Issues Posed in Measuring the Effects of Television Sexual Content Exposure [J].
Collins, Rebecca L. .
COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2008, 2 (1-2) :65-79
[9]   Media multitasking between two conversational tasks [J].
David, Prabu ;
Xu, Linda ;
Srivastava, Jatin ;
Kim, Jung-Hyun .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (04) :1657-1663
[10]  
Eastin MathewS., 2000, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1083-6101.2000.TB00110.X