Randomized clinical trial of concomitant or sequential phlebectomy after endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins

被引:89
作者
Carradice, D. [1 ]
Mekako, A. I. [1 ]
Hatfield, J. [1 ]
Chetter, I. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Acad Vasc, Surg Unit, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
HEALTH SURVEY SF-36; ABLATION; VALIDITY; SURGERY; QUALITY; EUROQOL; TESTS;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.6556
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The management of residual varicosities following endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) for varicose veins is contentious. Ambulatory phlebectomy may be performed concomitantly with the initial EVLT, or sequentially as a secondary procedure. This randomized trial compared these two approaches. Methods. Fifty patients with great saphenous varicose veins were randomized to EVLT alone or EVLT with concomitant ambulatory phlebectomies (EVLTAP). Principal outcomes were procedure duration, pain scores, requirement for secondary procedures and quality of life after 3 months. Results: EVLTAP took longer, but significantly decreased the requirement for subsequent interventions. There was no impairment in immediate postprocedural pain, Short Form 36 or EuroQol 5D scores with EVLTAP. Median (i.q.r.) Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) at 3 months was lower for EVLTAP than for EVLT alone (0 (0-1) versus 2 (0-2); P < 0.001), with lower Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) scores at 6 weeks (7.9 (4.1-10.7) vermis 13.5 (10.9-18.1); P < 0.001) and 3 months (2.0 (0.4-7.7) versus 9.6 (2.2-13.8); P = 0.015). At 1 year, there were no differences in VCSS or AVVQ scores. Conclusion: Concomitant phlebectomy with EVLT prolonged the procedure, but reduced the need for secondary procedures and significantly improved quality of life and the severity of venous disease.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 375
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Beale R, 2006, BRIT J SURG, V93, P50
  • [2] TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE EUROQOL AND COMPARING IT WITH THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
    BRAZIER, J
    JONES, N
    KIND, P
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (03) : 169 - 180
  • [3] EuroQol: The current state of play
    Brooks, R
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) : 53 - 72
  • [4] Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins
    Darwood, R. J.
    Theivacumar, N.
    Dellagrammaticas, D.
    Mavor, A. I. D.
    Gough, M. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) : 294 - 301
  • [5] Davies A H, 1995, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V40, P298
  • [6] Garratt A M, 1993, Qual Health Care, V2, P5, DOI 10.1136/qshc.2.1.5
  • [7] Responsiveness of the SF-36 and a condition-specific measure of health for patients with varicose veins
    Garratt, AM
    Ruta, DA
    Abdalla, MI
    Russell, IT
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (02) : 223 - 234
  • [8] THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - AN OUTCOME MEASURE SUITABLE FOR ROUTINE USE WITHIN THE NHS
    GARRATT, AM
    RUTA, DA
    ABDALLA, MI
    BUCKINGHAM, JK
    RUSSELL, IT
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6890): : 1440 - 1444
  • [9] Validation of the new venous severity scoring system in varicose vein surgery
    Kakkos, SK
    Rivera, MA
    Matsagas, MI
    Lazarides, MK
    Robless, P
    Belcaro, G
    Geroulakos, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (02) : 224 - 228
  • [10] Luebke T, 2008, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V49, P213