Intimate Partner Violence Screening Tools A Systematic Review

被引：352
作者：
Rabin, Rebecca F. [1 ,2 ]
Jennings, Jacky M. [3 ,4 ]
Campbell, Jacquelyn C. [5 ]
Bair-Merritt, Megan H. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Pediat Residency Program, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Div Gen Pediat & Adolescent Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD USA
来源：
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE | 2009年 / 36卷 / 05期
关键词：
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; PHYSICAL HEALTH; CARE; QUESTIONS; ACCURACY; FAMILY; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; INJURY; WOMEN;
D O I：
10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.024
中图分类号：
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号：
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要：
Context: Intimate partner violence (IPV) screening remains controversial. Major medical organizations mandate screening, whereas the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) cautions that there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening. An effective IPV screening program must include a screening tool with sound psychometric properties. A systematic review was conducted to summarize IPV screening tools tested in healthcare settings, providing a discussion of existing psychometric data and an assessment of study quality. Evidence acquisition: From the end of 2007 through 2008, three published literature databases were searched from their start through December 2007; this search was augmented with a bibliography search and expert consultation. Eligible studies included English-language publications describing the psychometric testing of an IPV screening tool in a healthcare setting. Study quality was judged using USPSTF criteria for diagnostic Studies. Evidence synthesis: Of 210 potentially eligible studies, 33 met inclusion criteria. The most Studied tools were the Hurt, Insult, Threaten, and Scream (HITS, sensitivity 30%-100%, specificity 86%-99%); the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST, sensitivity 47%, specificity 96%); the Partner Violence Screen (PVS, sensitivity 35%-71%, specificity 80%-94%); and the Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS, sensitivity 93%-94%, specificity 55%-99%). Internal reliability (HITS, WAST); test-retest reliability (AAS); concurrent validity (HITS, WAST); discriminant validity (WAST); and predictive validity (PVS) were also assessed. Overall study quality was fair to good. Conclusions: No single IPV screening tool had well-established psychometric properties. Even the most common tools were evaluated in only a small number Of Studies. Sensitivities and specificities varied widely within and between screening tools. Further testing and validation are critically needed. (Am J Prev Med 2009;36(5):439-445) (c) 2009 American Journal of Preventive Medicine
引用
收藏
页码：439 / 445
页数：7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
*AM AC FAM PHYS, FAM VIOL AB
[2]  
*AM COLL EM PHYS, DOM FAM VIOL
[3]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, VIOL WOM SCREEN TOOL
[4]   Preventive care in the emergency department: Screening for domestic violence in the emergency department [J].
Anglin, D ;
Sachs, C .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (10) :1118-1127
[5]  
Basile K.C., 2007, INTIMATE PARTNER VIO
[6]  
Berg AO, 2004, ANN INTERN MED, V140, P382, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00021
[7]   Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm - A meta-analysis [J].
Bhutta, AT ;
Cleves, MA ;
Casey, PH ;
Cradock, MM ;
Anand, KJS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (06) :728-737
[8]   Health outcomes in women with physical and sexual intimate partner violence exposure [J].
Bonomi, Amy E. ;
Anderson, Melissa L. ;
Rivara, Frederick P. ;
Thompson, Robert S. .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2007, 16 (07) :987-997
[9]  
Brown JB, 2000, J FAM PRACTICE, V49, P896
[10]   Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children [J].
Campbell, JC ;
Lewandowski, LA .
PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 20 (02) :353-+
123456