Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:76
|
作者
Lund, Ninna S. [1 ]
Persson, Lisa K. G. [2 ]
Jango, Hanna [3 ]
Gommesen, Ditte [4 ]
Westergaard, Hanne B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Herning Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Herning, Denmark
[2] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Herlev Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Odense, Denmark
[5] North Zealand Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Hillerod, Denmark
关键词
Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Operative vaginal delivery; Vacuum extraction; Episiotomy; Meta-analysis; OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY; MEDIOLATERAL EPISIOTOMY; WOMEN; LACERATION; MORBIDITY; RUPTURE; TRENDS; LABOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) is increased in vacuum-assisted delivery. However, it remains unclear whether episiotomy may protect against OASIS in this type of delivery. The objective of this study was to assess whether mediolateral or lateral episiotomy affects the risk of OASIS in vacuum assisted delivery among primiparous women. Data were found searching The PubMed, Cochrane library and Embase databases electronically. Studies investigating the risk of OASIS in vacuum-assisted delivery with and without the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy were considered for inclusion. Of the 452 studies found, 15 observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. All authors assessed risk of bias of the included studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) quality score. According to this meta-analysis, mediolateral or lateral episiotomy significantly reduced the risk of OASIS in vacuum-assisted deliveries in primiparous women (OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.37-0.77)). Numbers needed to treat (NNT) was 18.3 (95% CI 17.7-18.9). The protective effect of episiotomy seemed most pronounced when performed in more than 75% of vacuum-assisted deliveries (OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.150.92)). In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed that mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was protective against OASIS and may be considered in vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women. Randomized controlled trials to further investigate this finding are warranted. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neonatal head circumference as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Raihan, Fatimah Sarah Mohd
    Kusuma, Julianty
    Nasution, Ahmad Azmi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (08)
  • [32] Substantial Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury during Vacuum Assisted Delivery: An Obstetrical Issue or Device Related?
    Baruch, Yoav
    Gold, Ronen
    Eisenberg, Hagit
    Amir, Hadar
    Yogev, Yariv
    Groutz, Asnat
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (23)
  • [33] Episcissors-60™ and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Olga Divakova
    Aethele Khunda
    Paul A. Ballard
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31 : 605 - 612
  • [34] Episcissors-60™ and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Divakova, Olga
    Khunda, Aethele
    Ballard, Paul A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (03) : 605 - 612
  • [35] The incidence of wound complications following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Okeahialam, Nicola Adanna
    Wong, Ka Woon
    Thakar, Ranee
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (02) : 182 - 191
  • [36] Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury?
    Gachon, Bertrand
    Menard, Carine Fradet
    Pierre, Fabrice
    Fritel, Xavier
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 300 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [37] French guidelines for restrictive episiotomy during instrumental delivery were not followed by an increase in obstetric anal sphincter injury
    Gachon, Bertrand
    Fritel, Xavier
    Riviere, Olivier
    Pereira, Bruno
    Vendittelli, Francoise
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [38] Obstetric anal sphincter injury after episiotomy in vacuum extraction: an epidemiological study using an emulated randomised trial approach
    Ankarcrona, V
    Zhao, H.
    Jacobsson, B.
    Wendel, S. Brismar
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (10) : 1663 - 1671
  • [39] Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries
    Wu, JM
    Williams, KS
    Hundley, AF
    Connolly, A
    Visco, AG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (02) : 525 - 528
  • [40] Anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury: Is there a difference between subtypes? A systematic review
    Zacche, Martino Maria
    Ghosh, Jayasish
    Liapis, Ilias
    Chilaka, Chioma
    Latthe, Pallavi
    Toozs-Hobson, Philip
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2023, 42 (07) : 1455 - 1469