Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:76
|
作者
Lund, Ninna S. [1 ]
Persson, Lisa K. G. [2 ]
Jango, Hanna [3 ]
Gommesen, Ditte [4 ]
Westergaard, Hanne B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Herning Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Herning, Denmark
[2] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Herlev Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Odense, Denmark
[5] North Zealand Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Hillerod, Denmark
关键词
Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Operative vaginal delivery; Vacuum extraction; Episiotomy; Meta-analysis; OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY; MEDIOLATERAL EPISIOTOMY; WOMEN; LACERATION; MORBIDITY; RUPTURE; TRENDS; LABOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) is increased in vacuum-assisted delivery. However, it remains unclear whether episiotomy may protect against OASIS in this type of delivery. The objective of this study was to assess whether mediolateral or lateral episiotomy affects the risk of OASIS in vacuum assisted delivery among primiparous women. Data were found searching The PubMed, Cochrane library and Embase databases electronically. Studies investigating the risk of OASIS in vacuum-assisted delivery with and without the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy were considered for inclusion. Of the 452 studies found, 15 observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. All authors assessed risk of bias of the included studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) quality score. According to this meta-analysis, mediolateral or lateral episiotomy significantly reduced the risk of OASIS in vacuum-assisted deliveries in primiparous women (OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.37-0.77)). Numbers needed to treat (NNT) was 18.3 (95% CI 17.7-18.9). The protective effect of episiotomy seemed most pronounced when performed in more than 75% of vacuum-assisted deliveries (OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.150.92)). In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed that mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was protective against OASIS and may be considered in vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women. Randomized controlled trials to further investigate this finding are warranted. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Okeahialam, Nicola Adanna
    Wong, Ka Woon
    Jha, Swati
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    Thakar, Ranee
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (06) : 1393 - 1405
  • [2] Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicola Adanna Okeahialam
    Ka Woon Wong
    Swati Jha
    Abdul H. Sultan
    Ranee Thakar
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 1393 - 1405
  • [3] Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Verghese, Tina Sara
    Champaneria, Rita
    Kapoor, Dharmesh S.
    Latthe, Pallavi Manish
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (10) : 1459 - 1467
  • [4] Morbidity associated with episiotomy in vacuum delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sagi-Dain, L.
    Sagi, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (08) : 1073 - 1081
  • [5] Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury and Anal Incontinence Following Vaginal Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    LaCross, Allison
    Groff, Meredith
    Smaldone, Arlene
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2015, 60 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [6] Obstetric anal sphincter injuries after episiotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tina Sara Verghese
    Rita Champaneria
    Dharmesh S Kapoor
    Pallavi Manish Latthe
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27 : 1459 - 1467
  • [7] Factors Associated with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury During Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery
    Chill, Henry H.
    Dick, Aharon
    Zarka, Wajdy
    Ayalon, Naama Vilk
    Rosenbloom, Joshua I.
    Shveiky, David
    Karavani, Gilad
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 35 (06) : 1183 - 1189
  • [8] Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial
    Bergendahl, Sandra
    Ankarcrona, Victoria
    Leijonhufvud, Asa
    Hesselman, Susanne
    Karlstrom, Sofie
    Kallner, Helena Kopp
    Wendel, Sophia Brismar
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [9] Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barba, Marta
    Bernasconi, Davide P.
    Manodoro, Stefano
    Frigerio, Matteo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 158 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [10] Operator experience affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum extraction deliveries
    Bergendahl, Sandra
    Lindberg, Petra
    Wendel, Sophia Brismar
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (06) : 787 - 794