Multicenter Evaluation of QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel V2 for Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens

被引:22
|
作者
Boers, Stefan A. [1 ]
Melchers, Willem J. G. [2 ]
Peters, Cas J. A. [2 ]
Toonen, Marga [2 ]
McHugh, Martin P. [3 ]
Templeton, Kate E. [3 ]
Claas, Eric C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Microbiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Med Microbiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Med Microbiol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
QIAstat-Dx; ePlex; molecular diagnostics; respiratory pathogen panel; respiratory tract infections; syndromic testing; REAL-TIME PCR; INFLUENZA-A; B VIRUSES; DIAGNOSIS; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01793-19
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel V2 (RP) is a novel molecular-method-based syndromic test for the simultaneous and rapid (similar to 70-min) detection of 18 viral and 3 bacterial pathogens causing respiratory infections. This report describes the first multicenter retrospective comparison of the performance of the QIAstat-Dx RP assay to the established ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel (RPP) assay, for which we used 287 respiratory samples from patients suspected with respiratory infections. The QIAstat-Dx RP assay detected 312 (92%) of the 338 respiratory targets that were detected by the ePlex RPP assay. Most of the discrepant results have been observed in the low-pathogen-load samples. In addition, the QIAstat-Dx RP assay detected 19 additional targets in 19 respiratory samples that were not detected by the ePlex RPP assay. Nine of these discordant targets were considered to represent true positives after discrepancy testing by a third method. The main advantage of the QIAstat-Dx system compared to other syndromic testing systems, including the ePlex RPP assay, is the ability to generate cycle threshold (C-T) values, which could help with the interpretation of results. Taking the data together, this study showed good performance of the QlAstat-Dx RP assay in comparison to the ePlex RPP assay for the detection of respiratory pathogens. The QIAstat-Dx RP assay offers a new, rapid, and accurate sample-to-answer multiplex panel for the detection of the most common viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens and therefore has the potential to direct appropriate therapy and infection control precautions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Evaluation of FilmArray respiratory panel multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of pathogens in adult outpatients with acute respiratory tract infection
    Kaku, Norihito
    Hashiguchi, Kohji
    Iwanaga, Yuki
    Akamatsu, Norihiko
    Matsuda, Junichi
    Kosai, Kosuke
    Uno, Naoki
    Morinaga, Yoshitomo
    Kitazaki, Takeshi
    Hasegawa, Hiroo
    Miyazaki, Taiga
    Fukuda, Masaaki
    Izumikawa, Koichi
    Mukae, Hiroshi
    Yanagihara, Katsunori
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 24 (09) : 734 - 738
  • [22] Evaluation of Seeplex™ Pneumobacter Multiplex PCR Kit for the Detection of Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens in Pediatric Patients
    Park, Joowon
    Kim, Jae Kyoung
    Rheem, Insoo
    Kim, Jongwan
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 29 (04): : 307 - 313
  • [23] Evaluation of xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST and xTAG Human Parainfluenza Virus Analyte-Specific Reagents for detection of human parainfluenza viruses in respiratory specimens
    Selvaraju, Suresh B.
    Selvarangan, Rangaraj
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2012, 72 (03) : 278 - 281
  • [24] Comprehensive Detection of Respiratory Bacterial and Viral Pathogens in the Middle Ear Fluid and Nasopharynx of Pediatric Patients With Acute Otitis Media
    Sawada, Shoichi
    Okutani, Fumino
    Kobayashi, Taisuke
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2019, 38 (12) : 1199 - 1203
  • [25] Evaluation of Viral Respiratory Pathogens Among Patients Initially Tested Negative for SARS-CoV-2
    Khoshakhlagh, Mahdieh
    Vojdani, Arastoo
    Amali, Arian
    Abolbashari, Samaneh
    Gholoobi, Aida
    Meshkat, Zahra
    JUNDISHAPUR JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 16 (07)
  • [26] Comparison of three multiplex PCR assays for the detection of respiratory viral infections: evaluation of xTAG respiratory virus panel fast assay, RespiFinder 19 assay and RespiFinder SMART 22 assay
    Dabisch-Ruthe, Mareike
    Vollmer, Tanja
    Adams, Ortwin
    Knabbe, Cornelius
    Dreier, Jens
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 12
  • [27] Prospective evaluation of nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing for rapid detection of bacterial pathogens in patients with lower respiratory tract infections
    Mu, Shengrui
    Hu, Long
    Zhang, Ye
    Liu, Yingmei
    Cui, Xiaojing
    Zou, Xiaohui
    Cao, Bin
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [28] Comparative Clinical Evaluation of NeoPlex RB-8 with Seeplex PneumoBacter ACE for Simultaneous Detection of Eight Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens
    Kim, Jeong Woo
    Hong, Seong Soo
    Lee, In Seop
    Chi, Hyun Young
    Kim, Soo-Ok
    Kim, Hyeong Nyeon
    Hong, Sun Pyo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (02)
  • [29] Evaluation of BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 plus for Detection of Bordetella pertussis in Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens from Children with Clinically Suspected Pertussis
    Li, Chi
    Huang, Chaoying
    Zhang, Ruimu
    Wang, Hongmei
    Tian, Shufeng
    Tang, Yi-Wei
    Deng, Jikui
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (01):
  • [30] Clinical Presentation and Co-Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Children Under 5 Years with Non-COVID-19 Bacterial and Viral Respiratory Tract Infections: A Prospective Study in Bialystok, Poland (2021-2022)
    Zdanowicz, Katarzyna
    Lewandowski, Dawid
    Majewski, Piotr
    Polkosnik, Kinga
    Liwoch-Nienartowicz, Nikolina
    Reszec-Gielazyn, Joanna
    Lebensztejn, Dariusz Marek
    Sulik, Artur
    Toczylowski, Kacper
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2023, 29