On the politics of discomfort

被引:61
作者
Chadwick, Rachelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Affective methodologies; affective praxis; discomfort; feminist research praxis; epistemic politics; interpretive hesitancy; whiteness; FEMINISM; METHODOLOGY; CHALLENGES; IGNORANCE; INJUSTICE; WONDER;
D O I
10.1177/1464700120987379
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article engages the politics of discomfort as a critical but neglected dimension of feminist methodologies and research praxis. Discomfort is explored as a 'sweaty concept' that opens space for transformative praxis and the emergence of feminist forms of knowing, being and resisting. I theorise discomfort as an epistemic and interpretive resource and a lively actant in research encounters, fieldwork and analytic and theory-praxis spaces. Building on the work of Clare Hemmings and Sara Ahmed, I trace discomfort as an affective intensity that matters for opening up resistant and anti-colonial feminist research practices and modes of knowledge production. Starting, and staying, with discomfortis theorised as a form of resistance to the reiteration of comfortable and normative truths and 'wilful ignorances'. Weaving together the work of postqualitative and postcolonial feminist theorists, the sticky praxis of discomfort is conceptualised as involving a number of research strategies, including: (1) engaging with 'gut feelings' and (2) embracing interpretive hesitancy. In moving beyond an idealisation of empathy as the central affective principle underlying feminist research praxis, this article explores the epistemic and political salience of discomfort as affective intensity, 'sweaty concept' and potentially transformative interpretive resource.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 574
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
[31]  
Haraway D., 2019, A/b: Auto/Biography Studies, V34, P565, DOI DOI 10.1080/08989575.2019.1664163
[32]   ''Strong objectivity'': A response to the new objectivity question [J].
Harding, S .
SYNTHESE, 1995, 104 (03) :331-349
[33]  
HEMMINGS C, 2004, CULTURAL STUDIES, V19, P548
[34]  
Holland J., 2007, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V10, P195, DOI [10.1080/13645570701541894, DOI 10.1080/13645570701541894]
[35]  
Hooks B, 2015, BLACK LOOKS: RACE AND REPRESENTATION, P21
[36]  
hooks Bell., 1999, YEARNING RACE GENDER
[37]  
Knudsen BT, 2015, AFFECTIVE METHODOLOGIES: DEVELOPING CULTURAL RESEARCH STRATEGIES FOR THE STUDY OF AFFECT, P1
[38]   Postbook: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography [J].
Lather, P .
SIGNS, 2001, 27 (01) :199-227
[39]  
LATHER P, 2008, VOICE QUALITATIVE IN
[40]  
Liljestrom Marianne., 2010, Working with Affect in Feminist Readings: Disturbing Differences