Leg muscle cross-sectional area measured by ultrasound is highly correlated with MRI

被引:21
|
作者
Sponbeck, Joshua K. [1 ]
Frandsen, Clint R. [1 ]
Ridge, Sarah T. [1 ]
Swanson, Derek A. [1 ]
Swanson, Dallin C. [1 ]
Johnson, A. Wayne [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Exercise Sci Dept, 1000 N Univ Ave, Provo, UT 84604 USA
关键词
Ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Leg muscles; Cross-sectional area;
D O I
10.1186/s13047-021-00446-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The leg muscles are important for balance, posture, and movement during static and dynamic activity. Obtaining cross-sectional area measurements (CSA) of the leg muscles helps researchers understand the health and force production capability of individual leg muscles. Therefore, having an easy to use and readily available method to assess leg muscle CSA is needed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the magnitude, repeatability, and validity of CSA measurements of select leg muscles from ultrasound (US) and the current gold standard, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods 20 healthy volunteers participated in this study. Each participant was imaged via US and MRI. The muscles of interest obtained on each participant consisted of the tibialis anterior at both 30 and 50% of the shank length, tibialis posterior at both 30 and 50% of the shank length, the flexor digitorum longus, the fibularis (peroneus) longus, and the fibularis (peroneus) brevis. Results Strong Pearson correlations were seen for all of the muscles when comparing US to MRI with a range from .7840 to .9676. For all measurements, standard error of the measurement ranged from .003 to 0.260 cm(2). Minimum detectable difference for muscle measurements ranged from .008 cm(2) for MRI fibularis longus and fibularis brevis to .693 cm(2) for MRI of tibialis anterior at 30%. US minimum detectable difference ranged from .125 cm(2) for the tibialis posterior muscle at 30% to .449 cm(2) for the tibialis anterior muscle at 50%. Conclusions Based on these results ultrasound is a valid method to obtain CSA of muscles of the leg when compared with MRI.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity of an anthropometric estimate of thigh muscle cross-sectional area
    Knapik, JJ
    Staab, JS
    Harman, EA
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1996, 28 (12): : 1523 - 1530
  • [22] MUSCLE STRENGTH, VOLUNTARY ACTIVATION AND CROSS-SECTIONAL MUSCLE AREA IN PATIENTS WITH FIBROMYALGIA
    NORREGAARD, J
    BULOW, PM
    VESTERGAARDPOULSEN, P
    THOMSEN, C
    DANNESKIOLDSAMSOE, B
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1995, 34 (10): : 925 - 931
  • [23] Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross-sectional area in the assessment of strength training-induced hypertrophy
    Franchi, M. V.
    Longo, S.
    Mallinson, J.
    Quinlan, J. I.
    Taylor, T.
    Greenhaff, P. L.
    Narici, M. V.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2018, 28 (03) : 846 - 853
  • [24] Peripheral Nerves: Not Only Cross-sectional Area in the Era of Radiomics
    Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
    Prada Gonzalez, Raquel
    Rossi, Federica
    Bignotti, Bianca
    Martinoli, Carlo
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 24 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [25] Validation of Panoramic Ultrasound Measurement of the Cross-Sectional Area of the Vastus Medialis
    Minnehan, Kaitlin S.
    Dexter, William W.
    Holt, Christina T.
    Scharnetzki, Liz
    Alex, James P.
    Chin, Kaitlyn E.
    Kokmeyer, Dirk J.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2023, 37 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [26] Median, Ulnar and Peroneal Nerve Cross-Sectional Area as a function of Muscle Mass and BMI
    Dikici, Aylin
    Ulasli, Alper Murat
    Dikici, Omer
    Eroglu, Selma
    Solak, Ozlem
    Toktas, Hasan
    Dundar, Umit
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES-TURKISH, 2016, 33 (04): : 585 - 593
  • [27] MRI analysis and clinical significance of lower extremity muscle cross-sectional area after spinal cord injury
    Robert M.Lester
    Kori Johnson
    Refka E.Khalil
    Rehan Khan
    Ashraf S.Gorgey
    NeuralRegenerationResearch, 2017, 12 (05) : 714 - 722
  • [28] Validity of Ultrasound Imaging in Measuring Quadriceps Muscle Thickness and Cross-Sectional Area in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis
    Sahathevan, Sharmela
    Khor, Ban-Hock
    Yeong, Chai Hong
    Tan, Teik Hin
    Mohaideen, Abdul Kareem Meera
    Ng, Hi Ming
    Ong, Gild Rick
    Narayanan, Sreelakshmi Sankara
    Gafor, Abdul Halim Abdul
    Goh, Bak Leong
    Bee, Boon Cheak
    Daud, Zulfitri 'Azuan Mat
    Chinna, Karuthan
    Karupaiah, Tilakavati
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2021, 45 (02) : 422 - 426
  • [29] MRI analysis and clinical significance of lower extremity muscle cross-sectional area after spinal cord injury
    Lester, Robert M.
    Johnson, Kori
    Khalil, Refka E.
    Khan, Rehan
    Gorgey, Ashraf S.
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2017, 12 (05) : 714 - 722
  • [30] Changes in vastus lateralis fibre cross-sectional area, pennation angle and fascicle length do not predict changes in muscle cross-sectional area
    Ruple, Bradley A.
    Mesquita, Paulo H. C.
    Godwin, Joshua S.
    Sexton, Casey L.
    Osburn, Shelby C.
    McIntosh, Mason C.
    Kavazis, Andreas N.
    Libardi, Cleiton A.
    Young, Kaelin C.
    Roberts, Michael D.
    EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 107 (11) : 1216 - 1224