Consequences of Secondary Calibrations on Divergence Time Estimates

被引:61
作者
Schenk, John J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia So Univ, Dept Biol, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; ABSOLUTE RATES; DIVERSIFICATION; LIKELIHOOD; SPECIATION; MODEL; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; UNCERTAINTY; HISTORY; FOSSILS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0148228
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Secondary calibrations (calibrations based on the results of previous molecular dating studies) are commonly applied in divergence time analyses in groups that lack fossil data; however, the consequences of applying secondary calibrations in a relaxed-clock approach are not fully understood. I tested whether applying the posterior estimate from a primary study as a prior distribution in a secondary study results in consistent age and uncertainty estimates. I compared age estimates from simulations with 100 randomly replicated secondary trees. On average, the 95% credible intervals of node ages for secondary estimates were significantly younger and narrower than primary estimates. The primary and secondary age estimates were significantly different in 97% of the replicates after Bonferroni corrections. Greater error in magnitude was associated with deeper than shallower nodes, but the opposite was found when standardized by median node age, and a significant positive relationship was determined between the number of tips/age of secondary trees and the total amount of error. When two secondary calibrated nodes were analyzed, estimates remained significantly different, and although the minimum and median estimates were associated with less error, maximum age estimates and credible interval widths had greater error. The shape of the prior also influenced error, in which applying a normal, rather than uniform, prior distribution resulted in greater error. Secondary calibrations, in summary, lead to a false impression of precision and the distribution of age estimates shift away from those that would be inferred by the primary analysis. These results suggest that secondary calibrations should not be applied as the only source of calibration in divergence time analyses that test time-dependent hypotheses until the additional error associated with secondary calibrations is more properly modeled to take into account increased uncertainty in age estimates.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Congruence test of molecular clock calibration hypotheses based on Bayes factor comparisons
    Andujar, Carmelo
    Soria-Carrasco, Victor
    Serrano, Jose
    Gomez-Zurita, Jesus
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (03): : 226 - 242
  • [2] [Anonymous], PAUP PHYLOGENETIC AN
  • [3] The modern molecular clock
    Bromham, L
    Penny, D
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2003, 4 (03) : 216 - 224
  • [4] The unbearable uncertainty of Bayesian divergence time estimation
    Dos Reis, Mario
    Yang, Ziheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 51 (01) : 30 - 43
  • [5] BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees
    Drummond, Alexei J.
    Rambaut, Andrew
    [J]. BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [6] Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence
    Drummond, Alexei J.
    Ho, Simon Y. W.
    Phillips, Matthew J.
    Rambaut, Andrew
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (05) : 699 - 710
  • [7] Duchene D, 2015, NELSI
  • [8] The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times
    Duchene, Sebastian
    Lanfear, Robert
    Ho, Simon Y. W.
    [J]. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 78 : 277 - 289
  • [9] Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision
    Graur, D
    Martin, W
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2004, 20 (02) : 80 - 86
  • [10] GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations
    Harmon, Luke J.
    Weir, Jason T.
    Brock, Chad D.
    Glor, Richard E.
    Challenger, Wendell
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 24 (01) : 129 - 131