Effect of supplementary firing options on cycle performance and CO2 emissions of an IGCC power generation system

被引:19
作者
Gnanapragasam, N. V. [1 ]
Reddy, B. V. [1 ]
Rosen, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario, Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
coal gasification; combined cycle; supplementary firing; syngas; CO2; emission; operating conditions; coal consumption; steam production; GASIFICATION PRESSURIZED COMBUSTION; EXERGY ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; HEAT-RECOVERY; PLANT; COAL; EFFICIENCY; CAPTURE; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1002/er.1499
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Supplementary firing is adopted in combined-cycle power plants to reheat low-temperature gas turbine exhaust before entering into the heat recovery steam generator. In an effort to identify suitable supplementary firing options in an integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power plant configuration, so as to use coal effectively, the performance is compared for three different supplementary firing options. The comparison identifies the better of the supplementary firing options based on higher efficiency and work output per unit mass of coal and lower CO2 emissions. The three supplementary firing options with the corresponding fuel used for the supplementary firing are: (i) partial gasification with char, (ii) full gasification with coal and (iii) full gasification with syngas. The performance of the IGCC system with these three options is compared with an option of the IGCC system without supplementary firing. Each supplementary firing option also involves pre-heating of the air entering the gas turbine combustion chamber in the gas cycle and reheating of the low-pressure steam in the steam cycle. The effects on coal consumption and CO2 emissions are analysed by varying the operating conditions such as pressure ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature, air pre-heat and supplementary firing temperature. The results indicate that more work output is produced per unit mass of coal when there is no supplementary firing. Among the supplementary firing options, the full gasification with syngas option produces the highest work output per unit mass of coal, and the partial gasification with char option emits the lowest amount of CO2 per unit mass of coal. Based on the analysis, the most advantageous option for low specific coal consumption and CO2 emissions is the supplementary firing case having full gasification with syngas as the fuel. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 661
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   Exergy analysis of a natural gas fired combined cycle power generation unit [J].
Reddy, B. V. ;
Mohamed, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2007, 4 (02) :180-196
[22]   Integration of power plant and amine scrubbing to reduce CO2 capture costs [J].
Romeo, Luis M. ;
Bolea, Irene ;
Escosa, Jesus M. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 28 (8-9) :1039-1046
[23]   Improving steam power plant efficiency through exergy analysis: effects of altering excess combustion air and stack-gas temperature [J].
Rosen, Marc A. ;
Tang, Raymond .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2008, 5 (01) :31-51
[24]   Assessing and improving the efficiencies of a steam power plant using exergy analysis. Part 2: improvements from modifying reheat pressure [J].
Rosen, Marc A. ;
Tang, Raymond .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2006, 3 (04) :377-390
[25]   Thermodynamic analysis of an LNG fuelled combined cycle power plant with waste heat recovery and utilization system [J].
Shi, Xiaojun ;
Che, Defu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2007, 31 (10) :975-998
[26]   Review of advances in combustion technology and biomass cofiring [J].
Sondreal, EA ;
Benson, SA ;
Hurley, JP ;
Mann, MD ;
Pavlish, JH ;
Swanson, ML ;
Weber, GF ;
Zygarlicke, CJ .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 71 (1-3) :7-38
[27]   Parametric analysis of a coal based combined cycle power plant [J].
Srinivas, T ;
Gupta, AVSSKS ;
Reddy, BV ;
Nag, PK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2006, 30 (01) :19-36
[28]   Efficiency of a combined gas-steam process [J].
Tuma, M ;
Oman, J ;
Sekavcnik, M .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 40 (11) :1163-1175
[29]   Combustion processes for carbon capture [J].
Wall, Terry F. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2007, 31 :31-47