Clinical differences between botulinum neurotoxin type A and B

被引:55
|
作者
Bentivoglio, Anna Rita [1 ]
Del Grande, Alessandra [1 ]
Petracca, Martina [1 ]
Ialongo, Tamara [1 ]
Ricciardi, Lucia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Inst Neurol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] UCL, UCL Inst Neurol, Sobel Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London, England
关键词
Botulinum toxin; Treatment; Therapy; BoNT/A; BoNT/B; Abobotulinum; Incobotulinum; Onabotulinum; Rimabotulinum; TOXIN TYPE-B; LONG-TERM EFFICACY; CERVICAL DYSTONIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION ASSAY; NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES; COMPLEXING PROTEINS; MOVEMENT-DISORDERS; HEMIFACIAL SPASM; MOUSE BIOASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.08.001
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In humans, the therapeutic use of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) is well recognized and continuously expanding. Four BoNTs are widely available for clinical practice: three are serotype A and one is serotype B: onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona), abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo) and incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco), timabotulinumtoxinB (B/Rima). A/Abo, A/Inco, A/Ona and B/Rima are all licensed worldwide for cervical dystonia. In addition, the three BoNTIA products are approved for blepharospasm and focal dystonias, spasticity, hemifacial spasm, hyperhidrosis and facial lines, with remarkable regional differences. These toxin brands differ for specific activity, packaging, constituents, excipient, and storage. Comparative literature assessing the relative safety and efficacy of different BoNT products is limited, most data come from reports on small samples, and only a few studies meet criteria of evidence-based medicine. One study compared the effects of BoNT/A and BoNT/B on muscle activity of healthy volunteers, showing similar neurophysiological effects with a dose ratio of 1:100. In cervical dystonia, when comparing the effects of BoNT/A and BoNT/B, results are more variable, some studies reporting roughly similar peak effect and overall duration (at a ratio of 1:66, others reporting substantially shorter duration of BoNT/B than BoNT/A (at a ratio 1/24). Although the results of clinical studies are difficult to compare for methodological differences (dose ratio, study design, outcome measures), it is widely accepted that: BoNT/B is clinically effective using appropriate doses as BoNT/A (1:40-50), injections are generally more painful, in most of the studies on muscular conditions, efficacy is shortet, and immunogenicity higher. Since the earliest clinical trials, it has been reported that autonomic side effects are more frequent after BoNT/B injections, and this observation encouraged the use of BoNT/B for sialorrhea, hyperhidrosis and other non-motor symptoms. In these indications the efficacy of toxins A and B are comparable and dose ratio is 1:25-30. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 84
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Botulinum Neurotoxin Therapy in the Clinical Management of Laryngeal Dystonia
    Yeung, Winnie
    Richards, Amanda L.
    Novakovic, Daniel
    TOXINS, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [42] Dose equivalence of two commercial preparations of botulinum neurotoxin type A: time for a reassessment?
    Wohlfarth, Kai
    Sycha, Thomas
    Ranoux, Daniele
    Naver, Hans
    Caird, David
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (07) : 1573 - 1584
  • [43] Clinical use of non-a botulinum toxins: botulinum toxin type B
    Dirk Dressler
    Roberto Eleopra
    Neurotoxicity Research, 2006, 9 : 121 - 125
  • [44] Clinical use of non-A botulinum toxins: Botulinum toxin type B
    Dressler, Dirk
    Eleopra, Roberto
    NEUROTOXICITY RESEARCH, 2006, 9 (2-3) : 121 - 125
  • [45] First clinical experience with botulinum toxin type B
    Dressler, D
    Benecke, R
    NERVENARZT, 2002, 73 (02): : 194 - 198
  • [46] Botulinum toxin type-A preparations are not the same medications - clinical studies (Part 2)
    Slawek, Jaroslaw
    Bogucki, Andrzej
    Bonikowski, Marcin
    Car, Halina
    Dec-Cwiek, Malgorzata
    Druzdz, Artur
    Koziorowski, Dariusz
    Sarzynska-Dlugosz, Iwona
    Rudzinska, Monika
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2021, 55 (02) : 141 - 157
  • [47] Patient perspectives on the therapeutic profile of botulinum neurotoxin type A in cervical dystonia (vol 268, pg 903, 2020)
    Comella, Cynthia
    Ferreira, Joaquim J.
    Pain, Emilie
    Azoulai, Marion
    Om, Savary
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 268 (03) : 913 - 913
  • [48] Temporal characteristics of botulinum neurotoxin therapy
    Lebeda, Frank J.
    Cer, Regina Z.
    Stephens, Robert M.
    Mudunuri, Uma
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2010, 10 (01) : 93 - 103
  • [49] Botulinum Neurotoxin for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain
    Egeo, Gabriella
    Fofi, Luisa
    Barbanti, Piero
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [50] A reappraisal of the central effects of botulinum neurotoxin type A: by what mechanism?
    Caleo, Matteo
    Antonucci, Flavia
    Restani, Laura
    Mazzocchio, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2009, 109 (01) : 15 - 24