The political logic of discourse: A neo-Gramscian view

被引：16

作者：

Martin, J ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ London Goldsmiths Coll, London SE14 6NW, England

来源：

HISTORY OF EUROPEAN IDEAS | 2002年 / 28卷 / 1-2期

关键词：

discourse; ideology; power; anti-foundationalism; Laclau and Mouffe; Gramsci;

D O I：

10.1016/S0191-6599(02)00004-9

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

This article contrasts Mark Bevir's approach to the history of ideas with a neo-Gramscian theory of discourse. Bevir puts the case for an 'anti-foundationalist' approach to understanding ideas, yet he defends a weak rationalism centred on individual intentions as the original source of all meanings. Discourse theorists--specifically Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe--also adopt an anti-foundationalist perspective but pursue its implications beyond any rationalism. The advantages of discourse theory are argued to lie in its emphasis on power and conflict in the constitution and transformation of social meanings and identity. Laclau and Mouffe's work, it is claimed, alerts us to a political logic of discourse that Bevir's more rationalist approach to 'ideas' sidesteps.

引用

页码：21 / 31

页数：11