Measuring critical success factors of TQM implementation successfully - a systematic literature review

被引:104
作者
Hietschold, Nadine [1 ]
Reinhardt, Ronny [1 ]
Gurtner, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Econ & Business, Chair Entrepreneurship & Innovat, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
total quality management; critical success factors; implementation; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; VALIDATION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2014.918288
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In times of globalisation and international trade, the concept of total quality management (TQM) as a strategy to enhance organisational performance is growing in importance. To exploit the benefits provided by TQM, organisations must manage the complex implementation process successfully. Therefore, organisations need to measure critical success factors (CSFs) when introducing TQM. However, previous research has developed a plethora of measurement instruments and researchers do not agree on certain factors or on one single measurement instrument. A systematic literature review is conducted to structure and clarify the scattered research field. The analysis of 145 studies reveals that CSFs can be classified into 11 distinct dimensions. The article proposes a three-level framework and a holistic set of measurement instruments to help researchers and managers measure each critical dimension in a timely and comprehensive manner. A focus group consisting of six quality managers validated these results. The study concludes with further findings and future research. Deficiencies of current measurements are presented and the article discusses the finding that human related factors are regarded as highly relevant but have remained low on many researchers' and practitioners' agendas. Hence, this article is a major contribution to structure the complex research field of measuring CSFs of TQM implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:6254 / 6272
页数:19
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   An international study of quality improvement approach and firm performance [J].
Adam, EE ;
Corbett, LM ;
Flores, BE ;
Harrison, NJ ;
Lee, TS ;
Rho, BH ;
Ribera, J ;
Samson, D ;
Westbrook, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1997, 17 (9-10) :842-+
[2]   Enhancing Production Performance and Customer Performance Through Total Quality Management (TQM): Strategies For Competitive Advantage [J].
Agus, Arawati ;
Hassan, Za'faran .
PROCEEDINGS OF 7TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2011, 24
[3]   Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs [J].
Ahire, SL ;
Golhar, DY ;
Waller, MA .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1996, 27 (01) :23-56
[4]   The mediator role of learning capability and business innovativeness between total quality management and financial performance [J].
Akgun, Ali E. ;
Ince, Huseyin ;
Imamoglu, Salih Z. ;
Keskin, Halit ;
Kocoglu, Ipek .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (03) :888-901
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, J ADV MANAGE RES
[6]  
Baidoun S., 2003, Logistics Information Management, V16, P156, DOI 10.1108/09576050310467296
[7]   Why total quality management programs do not persist: The role of management quality and implications for leading a TQM transformation [J].
Beer, M .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2003, 34 (04) :623-642
[8]   The influence of soft factors on quality improvement and performance: Perceptions from managers [J].
Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Penang Darul Makmur, Malaysia ;
不详 ;
不详 .
TQM Journal, 2008, 20 (05) :436-452
[9]   AN EMPIRICAL-MODEL FOR TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT [J].
BLACK, S ;
PORTER, LJ .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 1995, 6 (02) :149-164
[10]  
Brah S.A., 2002, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V19, P356, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656710210421553