Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

被引:151
作者
Liu, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Min [3 ]
Sun, Xiaorong [4 ]
Li, Wenwu [4 ]
Xing, Ligang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jinming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Shandong Key Lab Radiat Oncol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Hosp Pingyi Cty, Dept Oncol, Pingyi, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; TOTAL LESION GLYCOLYSIS; METABOLIC TUMOR BURDEN; STAGE-I; VOLUMETRIC PARAMETERS; FDG PET/CT; F-18-FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE UPTAKE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0146195
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The identification of surgical non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor prognosis is a priority in clinical oncology because of their high 5-year mortality. This meta-analysis explored the prognostic value of maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in surgical NSCLC patients. Materials and Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Libraries were systematically searched until August 1, 2015. Prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated the prognostic roles of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT with complete DFS and OS data in surgical NSCLC patients were included. The impact of SUVmax, MTV or TLG on survival was measured using hazard ratios (HR). Sub-group analyses were performed based on disease stage, pathological classification, surgery only and cut-off values. Results Thirty-six studies comprised of 5807 patients were included. The combined HRs for DFS were 2.74 (95% CI 2.33-3.24, unadjusted) and 2.43 (95% CI: 1.76-3.36, adjusted) for SUVmax, 2.27 (95% CI 1.77-2.90, unadjusted) and 2.49 (95% CI 1.23-5.04, adjusted) for MTV, and 2.46 (95% CI 1.91-3.17, unadjusted) and 2.97 (95% CI 1.68-5.28, adjusted) for TLG. The pooled HRs for OS were 2.54 (95% CI 1.86-3.49, unadjusted) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.16-2.00, adjusted) for SUVmax, 2.07 (95% CI 1.16-3.69, unadjusted) and 1.91 (95% CI 1.13-3.22, adjusted) for MTV, and 2.47 (95% CI 1.38-4.43, unadjusted) and 1.94 (95% CI 1.12-3.33, adjusted) for TLG. Begg's test detected publication bias, the trim and fill procedure was performed, and similar HRs were obtained. The prognostic role of SUVmax, MTV and TLG remained similar in the sub-group analyses. Conclusions High values of SUVmax, MTV and TLG predicted a higher risk of recurrence or death in patients with surgical NSCLC. We suggest the use of FDG PET/CT to select patients who are at high risk of disease recurrence or death and may benefit from aggressive treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Revisiting the prognostic value of preoperative 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in early-stage (I & II) non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC)
    Agarwal, Mohit
    Brahmanday, Govinda
    Bajaj, Sunil K.
    Ravikrishnan, K. P.
    Wong, Ching-Yee Oliver
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (04) : 691 - 698
  • [2] OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS
    BEGG, CB
    MAZUMDAR, M
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) : 1088 - 1101
  • [3] Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) -: A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European lung cancer working party for the IASLC lung cancer staging project
    Berghmans, Thierry
    Dusart, Michele
    Paesmans, Marianne
    Hossein-Foucher, Claude
    Buvat, Irene
    Castaigne, Catherine
    Scherpereel, Arnaud
    Mascaux, Celine
    Moreau, Michel
    Roelandts, Martine
    Alard, Stphane
    Meert, Anne-Pascale
    Patz, Edward F., Jr.
    Lafitte, Jean-Jacques
    Sculier, Jean-Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 3 (01) : 6 - 12
  • [4] The Prognostic Significance of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of Primary Tumor in Surgically Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Analysis of 413 Cases
    Bille, Andrea
    Okiror, Lawrence
    Skanjeti, Andrea
    Errico, Luca
    Arena, Vincenzo
    Penna, Daniele
    Ardissone, Francesco
    Pelosi, Ettore
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2013, 14 (02) : 149 - 156
  • [5] Boellaard R, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1519
  • [6] Prediction of 2 years-survival in patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT SUV quantification
    Cistaro, Angelina
    Quartuccio, Natale
    Mojtahedi, Alireza
    Fania, Piercarlo
    Filosso, Pier Luigi
    Campenni, Alfredo
    Ficola, Umberto
    Baldari, Sergio
    [J]. RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 47 (03) : 219 - 223
  • [7] Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy?
    Cook, Gary J. R.
    Yip, Connie
    Siddique, Muhammad
    Goh, Vicky
    Chicklore, Sugama
    Roy, Arunabha
    Marsden, Paul
    Ahmad, Shahreen
    Landau, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 54 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [8] PET-Based Primary Tumor Volumetric Parameters and Survival of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
    Davison, Jessica
    Mercier, Gustavo
    Russo, Gregory
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (03) : 635 - 640
  • [9] [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and its prognostic value in lung cancer
    Dhital, K
    Saunders, CAB
    Seed, PT
    O'Doherty, MJ
    Dussek, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 18 (04) : 425 - 428
  • [10] A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy
    Dinnes, J
    Deeks, J
    Kirby, J
    Roderick, P
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2005, 9 (12) : 1 - +