Neural network earnings per share forecasting models: A comparison of backward propagation and the genetic algorithm

被引:44
作者
Cao, Qing [1 ]
Parry, Mark E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Rawls Coll Business, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Bloch Sch 318, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
关键词
Artificial neural network; Comparative analysis; Forecasting methods; TIME-SERIES MODELS; FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2008.12.011
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Zhang, Cao, and Schniederjans [W. Zhang. Q. Cao. M. Schniederjans, Neural Network Earnings Per Share Forecasting Models: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Methods. Decision Sciences 35(2) (2004). 205-237. hereafter ZCS] examined the relative ability of neural network models to forecast earnings per share. Their results indicate that the univariate NN model significantly outperformed four alternative univariate models examined in prior research. The authors also found that a neural network forecasting model incorporating fundamental accounting signals outperformed two variations of the multivariate forecasting model examined by Abarbanell and Bushee [J.S. Abarbanell, B.J. Bushee. Fundamental Analysis, Future EPS, and Stock Prices. journal of Accounting Research 35(1) (1997), 1-24]. To estimate the neural network weights of their neural network models, ZCS used backward propagation (BP). In this paper we compare the forecasting accuracy of neural network weights estimated with BP to ones derived from an alternative estimation procedure, the genetic algorithm [R.S. Sexton, R.E. Dorsey, N.A. Sikander, Simultaneous Optimization of Neural Network Function and Architecture Algorithm. Decision Support Systems 36(3) (2004), 283-296]. We find that the genetic algorithm produces models that are significantly more accurate than the models examined by ZCS. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 41
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abarbanell JS, 1998, ACCOUNT REV, V73, P19
[2]   Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices [J].
Abarbanell, JS ;
Bushee, BJ .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1997, 35 (01) :1-24
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS COMP
[4]  
BATHKE AW, 1984, ACCOUNT REV, V59, P163
[5]  
Beneish MessodD., 2001, REV ACCOUNT STUD, V6, P165, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1011654624255
[6]   UNIVARIATE TIME-SERIES MODELS OF QUARTERLY ACCOUNTING EARNINGS PER SHARE - PROPOSED MODEL [J].
BROWN, LD ;
ROZEFF, MS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1979, 17 (01) :179-189
[7]   Neural network forecasting of quarterly accounting earnings [J].
Callen, JL ;
Kwan, CCY ;
Yip, PCY ;
Yuan, YF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1996, 12 (04) :475-482
[8]   CONSENSUS FORECASTS OF CORPORATE-EARNINGS - ANALYSTS FORECASTS AND TIME-SERIES METHODS [J].
CONROY, R ;
HARRIS, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1987, 33 (06) :725-738
[9]   Machine learning for direct marketing response models: Bayesian networks with evolutionary programming [J].
Cui, G ;
Wong, ML ;
Lui, HK .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (04) :597-612
[10]   GENETIC ALGORITHMS FOR ESTIMATION PROBLEMS WITH MULTIPLE OPTIMA, NONDIFFERENTIABILITY, AND OTHER IRREGULAR FEATURES [J].
DORSEY, RE ;
MAYER, WJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1995, 13 (01) :53-66