Integrated food waste and sewage treatment - A better approach than conventional food waste-sludge co-digestion for higher energy recovery via anaerobic digestion

被引:57
作者
Kaur, Guneet [1 ]
Luo, Liwen [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Guanghao [3 ]
Wong, Jonathan W. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Biol, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Sino Forest Appl Res Ctr Pearl River Delta Enviro, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Food waste disposer; Co-digestion; Sewage sludge; Single-phase AD; Wastewater treatment; INTERSPECIES ELECTRON-TRANSFER; PRIMARY-TREATED SLUDGE; ACIDOGENIC REACTOR; METHANE PRODUCTION; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; ETHANOL; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121698
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This work proposes a new treatment approach involving both food waste disposal and sewerage treatment called MOWFAST i.e. Municipal Organic Waste management by combined Food waste disposal and Sewerage Treatment. MOWFAST involves mixing of food waste directly with raw sewage instead of separate addition to sludge and their combined anaerobic digestion (AD). Compared to conventional sludge digestion, MOWFAST exhibited better digestion capability and allowed a greater degradation of organic material along with higher production of methanogenic-favourable products from the beginning of digestion. This resulted in producing higher specific methane yields (7.86 LCH4/kg VSadded versus 0.95 LCH4/kg VSadded) and 1.4-fold higher cumulative methane yield over sludge AD. Furthermore, compared with conventional food waste-sludge co-digestion, MOWFAST gave higher solubilization of organic material (0.82 g sCOD/g VSadded versus 0.23 g sCOD/g VSadded) and specific methane yields (7.86 LCH4/kg VSadded versus 3.2 LCH4/kg VSadded). This proves its feasibility for digestion and methane generation potential.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Elucidating microbial community adaptation to anaerobic co-digestion of fats, oils, and grease and food waste
    Amha, Yamrot M.
    Sinha, Pooja
    Lagman, Jewls
    Gregori, Matt
    Smith, Adam L.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 123 : 277 - 289
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, PREP STUD FOOD WAST
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
  • [4] Advances towards understanding and engineering direct interspecies electron transfer in anaerobic digestion
    Barua, Sajib
    Dhar, Bipro Ranjan
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 244 : 698 - 707
  • [5] Bogner J., 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
  • [6] Addition of granular activated carbon and trace elements to favor volatile fatty acid consumption during anaerobic digestion of food waste
    Capson-Tojo, Gabriel
    Moscoviz, Roman
    Ruiz, Diane
    Santa-Catalina, Gaelle
    Trably, Eric
    Rouez, Maxime
    Crest, Marion
    Steyer, Jean-Philippe
    Bernet, Nicolas
    Delgenes, Jean-Philippe
    Escudie, Renaud
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 260 : 157 - 168
  • [7] Co-digestion of food waste and chemically enhanced primary treated sludge in a continuous stirred tank reactor
    Chakraborty, Debkumar
    Karthikeyan, Obulisamy Parthiba
    Selvam, Ammaiyappan
    Wong, Jonathan W. C.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 111 : 232 - 240
  • [8] High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: Stability and performance
    Dai, Xiaohu
    Duan, Nina
    Dong, Bin
    Dai, Lingling
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (02) : 308 - 316
  • [9] Interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic propionate degrading consortia
    de Bok, FAM
    Plugge, CM
    Stams, AJM
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (06) : 1368 - 1375
  • [10] Organic loading rate: A promising microbial management tool in anaerobic digestion
    Ferguson, Robert M. W.
    Coulon, Frederic
    Villa, Raffaella
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 100 : 348 - 356