Alcohol use disorders among emergency department-treated older adolescents: A new brief screen (RUFT-Cut) using the AUDIT, CAGE, CRAFFT, and RAPS-QF

被引:53
作者
Kelly, TM [1 ]
Donovan, JE [1 ]
Chung, T [1 ]
Cook, RL [1 ]
Delbridge, TR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
alcohol screening; adolescent; alcohol use disorders; emergency department;
D O I
10.1097/01.ALC.0000125346.37075.85
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Early identification of alcohol use disorders (AUD) among emergency department (ED)-treated patients is important for facilitating intervention and further evaluation outside EDs. A number of brief screening instruments have been developed for identifying patients with AUD, but it is not clear whether they are practical and perform well with older adolescents in an ED setting. This study contrasted four brief screening instruments for detecting DSM-IV-defined AUD and tested a newly developed brief screen for use among ED-treated older adolescents. Methods: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), the CAGE, the CRAFFT, and a modified RAPS-QF were given to 93 alcohol-using older adolescents (55% men; aged 18-20 years) in an ED. Receiver operator characteristic analyses were used to evaluate the performance of brief screens against the criterion of a lifetime DSM-IV alcohol abuse or dependence diagnosis. Results: Of existing instruments, the AUDIT had the best overall performance in identifying AUD (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 78%). A new, shorter screening instrument composed of two AUDIT items, two CRAFFT items, and one CAGE item (RUFT-Cut) performed as well as the AUDIT (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 78%). Conclusions: Among existing alcohol screening instruments, the AUDIT performed best for identifying ED-treated older adolescents with alcohol use disorders. The RUFT-Cut is a brief screening instrument for AUD that shows promise for identifying ED-treated older adolescents who are in need of intervention or further evaluation. Future research should focus on use of the RUFT-Cut in other settings with larger, more diverse samples of adolescents.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 753
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) [J].
Allen, JP ;
Litten, RZ ;
Fertig, JB ;
Babor, T .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 21 (04) :613-619
[2]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1994, DIAGN STAT MAN PSYCH
[3]   Identification and brief treatment of alcohol problems with medical patients: An international perspective [J].
Barnett, NP ;
Monti, PM ;
Cherpitel, C ;
Bendtsen, P ;
Borges, G ;
Colby, SM ;
Nordqvist, C ;
Johansson, K .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 27 (02) :262-270
[4]  
*CDCP, 2002, J SCH HLTH, V72, P313
[5]   Screening for alcohol problems in the emergency room: A rapid alcohol problems screen [J].
Cherpitel, CJ .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1995, 40 (02) :133-137
[6]   Performance of screening instruments for identifying alcohol dependence in the general population, compared with clinical populations [J].
Cherpitel, CJ .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 22 (07) :1399-1404
[7]   Screening for alcohol problems in the US general population: Comparison of the CAGE, RAPS4, and RAPS4-QF by gender, ethnicity, and service utilization [J].
Cherpitel, CJ .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 26 (11) :1686-1691
[8]   Prevalence of DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses and symptoms in adolescent community and clinical samples [J].
Chung, T ;
Martin, CS ;
Armstrong, TD ;
Labouvie, EW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 41 (05) :546-554
[9]   Screening adolescents for problem drinking: Performance of brief screens against DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses [J].
Chung, T ;
Colby, SM ;
Barnett, NP ;
Rohsenow, DJ ;
Spirito, A ;
Monti, PM .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2000, 61 (04) :579-587
[10]   A critical evaluation of several alcohol screening instruments using the CIDI-SAM as a criterion measure [J].
Clements, R .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 22 (05) :985-993