Detecting Prostate Cancer A Prospective Comparison of Systematic Prostate Biopsy With Targeted Biopsy Guided by Fused MRI and Transrectal Ultrasound

被引:15
|
作者
Brock, Marko [1 ]
von Bodman, Christian [1 ]
Palisaar, Jueri [1 ]
Becker, Wolfgang [2 ]
Martin-Seidel, Philipp [2 ]
Noldus, Joachim [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Dept Urol, Marien Hosp Herne, D-44627 Herne, Germany
[2] Radiol Gemeinschaftpraxis, Herne, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2015年 / 112卷 / 37期
关键词
REAL-TIME ELASTOGRAPHY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SATURATION BIOPSY; FUSION BIOPSY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; POPULATION; GUIDELINES; SPECIMENS; SERIES;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2015.0605
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: When prostate cancer is suspected, the prostate gland is biopsied with the aid of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). The sensitivity of prostatic biopsy is about 50%. The fusion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data with TRUS enables the targeted biopsy of suspicious areas. We studied whether this improves the detection of prostate cancer. Methods: 168 men with suspected prostate cancer underwent prostate MRI after a previous negative biopsy. Suspicious lesions were assessed with the classification of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and biopsied in targeted fashion with the aid of fused MRI and TRUS. At the same sitting, a systematic biopsy with at least 12 biopsy cores was performed. Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 71 patients (42.3%; 95% CI, 35.05-49.82). The detection rate of fusion-assisted targeted biopsy was 19% (95% CI, 13.83-25.65), compared to 37.5% (95% CI, 30.54-45.02) with systematic biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was more commonly revealed by targeted biopsy (84.4%; 95% CI, 68.25-93.14) than by systematic biopsy (65.1%; 95% CI, 52.75-75.67). In 7 patients with normal MRI findings, cancer was detected by systematic biopsy alone. Compared to systematic biopsy, targeted biopsy had a higher overall detection rate (16.5% vs. 6.3%), a higher rate of infiltration per core (30% vs. 10%), and a higher rate of detection of poorly differentiated carcinoma (18.5% vs. 3%). Patients with negative biopsies did not undergo any further observation. Conclusion: MRI/TRUS fusion-assisted targeted biopsy improves the detection rate of prostate cancer after a previous negative biopsy. Targeted biopsy is more likely to reveal clinically significant cancer than systematic biopsy; nevertheless, systematic biopsy should still be performed, even if the MRI findings are negative.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / U13
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Schaefer, Georg
    Steiner, Eberhard
    Jaschke, Werner
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Nagele, Udo
    Halpern, Ethan J.
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (03) : 341 - 346
  • [22] Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate
    Nash, PA
    Bruce, JE
    Indudhara, R
    Shinohara, K
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (02) : 607 - 609
  • [23] MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy of Native and Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Woodrum, David A.
    Gorny, Krzysztof R.
    Greenwood, Bernadette
    Mynderse, Lance A.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (03) : 196 - 205
  • [24] Environmental Impact of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Gordon, Ilyssa O.
    Nolte, Adam C.
    Perecman, Aaron
    Loeb, Stacy
    Overcash, Michael
    Sherman, Jodi D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (05) : 463 - 471
  • [25] Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study
    Pham, Trang H. N.
    Schulze-Hagen, Maximilian F.
    Rahnama'i, Mohammad S.
    CANCER REPORTS, 2024, 7 (02)
  • [26] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus combined magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion and systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice
    Bae, Jae Heung
    Kim, See Hyung
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2020, 39 (02) : 137 - 143
  • [27] MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Wilbur, Andrew R.
    Reese, Sarah E.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Gomella, Patrick T.
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Siddiqui, Minhaj
    Pinsky, Paul
    Parnes, Howard
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10) : 917 - 928
  • [28] A simple method to improve the efficiency of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Favazza, T
    Perkel, JA
    Bennerman, R
    Nseyo, U
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05) : 1989 - 1989
  • [29] Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy:: A prospective study and review of the literature
    Rodríguez, LV
    Terris, MK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) : 2115 - 2120
  • [30] Safety and tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Vazquez Rodrigueza, A.
    Quirce Andres, F.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2007, 49 (06): : 417 - 423