Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research

被引:44
作者
Coleman, Carl H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seton Hall Univ, Sch Law, S Orange, NJ 07079 USA
关键词
FAIR BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00346.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines and critiques the use of the term "vulnerability" in U.S. and international regulations and guidelines on research ethics. After concluding that the term is currently used in multiple, often inconsistent, senses, it calls on regulators to differentiate between three distinct types of vulnerability: "consent-based vulnerability," "risk-based vulnerability," and "justice-based vulnerability:"
引用
收藏
页码:12 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条