Biomechanical properties of the sciatic nerve following repair: effects of topical application of hyaluronic acid or tacrolimus

被引:0
作者
Mekaj, Agon Y. [1 ]
Morina, Arsim A. [1 ]
Lajqi, Shpetim [2 ]
Manxhuka-Kerliu, Suzana [3 ]
Kelmendi, Fatos M. [1 ]
Duci, Shkelzen B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Prishtina, Fac Med, Clin Neurosurg, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo, Serbia
[2] Univ Prishtina, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Construct & Mech, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo, Serbia
[3] Univ Prishtina, Fac Med, Inst Pathol, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo, Serbia
[4] Univ Prishtina, Fac Med, Clin Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo, Serbia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2015年 / 8卷 / 11期
关键词
Biomechanical properties; hyaluronic acid; rabbits; tacrolimus; scar; sciatic nerve healing; PERIPHERAL-NERVE; SCAR FORMATION; REGENERATION; INJURY; FK506; RESISTANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Recovery following nerve repair can be evaluated based on electrophysiological and morphological assessments of biomechanical properties. This study compared the effects of topical hyaluronic acid (HA), tacrolimus (FK-506) or saline administration on the biomechanical properties of the sciatic nerve at 12 weeks after nerve repair. Materials and Methods: Eighteen male European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) (weight from 2.5 to 3 kg) were randomly assigned to one of the following experimental groups (six animals per group): Saline, HA, or FK-506. The non-transected left leg was used as a control group (eighteen sciatic nerves). Biomechanical assays were performed and statistically analyzed. Results: The average maximal load, elastic limit load, maximal stress, and elastic limit strain of the control group were significantly different (P < 0.001) from those of all three experimental groups. Moreover, the other examined parameters (i.e., maximal displacement, elastic limit stress, and maximal strain) were significantly different between the control group and all three experimental groups (P < 0.0001). However, no significant differences in any of the biomechanical parameters were observed between the experimental groups (P > 0.05). At 12 weeks after nerve repair, Saline, HA, and FK-506 groups displayed average maximal stress values that were 72.6%, 77.38%, and 73.8% of those in the control group (100%), respectively. Conclusion: The biomechanical properties of the HA and FK-506 groups were similar to those of the saline group at 12 weeks after nerve repair.
引用
收藏
页码:20218 / 20226
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Unravelling crucial biomechanical resilience of myelinated peripheral nerve fibres provided by the Schwann cell basal lamina and PMP22
    Rosso, Gonzalo
    Liashkovich, Ivan
    Gess, Burkhard
    Young, Peter
    Kun, Alejandra
    Shahin, Victor
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
  • [22] The toe-spreading reflex of the rabbit revisited-functional evaluation of complete peroneal nerve lesions
    Schmitz, HC
    Beer, GM
    [J]. LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2001, 35 (04) : 340 - 345
  • [23] IDENTIFICATION AND DIFFERENTIAL DISTRIBUTION OF COLLAGEN TYPES IN THE CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEMS
    SHELLSWELL, GB
    RESTALL, DJ
    DUANCE, VC
    BAILEY, AJ
    [J]. FEBS LETTERS, 1979, 106 (02) : 305 - 308
  • [24] MR Neurography: T1 and T2 Measurements in Acute Peripheral Nerve Traction Injury in Rabbits
    Shen, Jun
    Zhou, Cui-Ping
    Zhong, Xiao-Mei
    Guo, Ruo-Mi
    Griffith, James F.
    Cheng, Li-Na
    Duan, Xiao-Hui
    Liang, Bi-Ling
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (03) : 729 - 738
  • [25] Development of the blood-nerve barrier in neonatal rats
    Smith, CE
    Atchabahian, A
    Mackinnon, SE
    Hunter, DA
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2001, 21 (07) : 290 - 297
  • [26] Repair of the Peripheral Nerve-Remyelination that Works
    Svennigsen, Asa Fex
    Dahlin, Lars B.
    [J]. BRAIN SCIENCES, 2013, 3 (03) : 1182 - 1197
  • [27] Resistance to disruption and gapping of peripheral nerve repairs: An in vitro biomechanical assessment of techniques
    Temple, CLF
    Ross, DC
    Dunning, CE
    Johnson, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2004, 20 (08) : 645 - 650
  • [28] Temple CLF, 2003, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V19, P483