Quantum process tomography of the quantum Fourier transform

被引:131
作者
Weinstein, YS
Havel, TF
Emerson, J
Boulant, N
Saraceno, M
Lloyd, S
Cory, DG
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Nucl Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Comis Nacl Energia Atom, Unidad Act Fis, RA-1429 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] MIT, Dept Mech Engn, dArbeloff Lab Informat Syst & Technol, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.1785151
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The results of quantum process tomography on a three-qubit nuclear magnetic resonance quantum information processor are presented and shown to be consistent with a detailed model of the system-plus-apparatus used for the experiments. The quantum operation studied was the quantum Fourier transform, which is important in several quantum algorithms and poses a rigorous test for the precision of our recently developed strongly modulating control fields. The results were analyzed in an attempt to decompose the implementation errors into coherent (overall systematic), incoherent (microscopically deterministic), and decoherent (microscopically random) components. This analysis yielded a superoperator consisting of a unitary part that was strongly correlated with the theoretically expected unitary superoperator of the quantum Fourier transform, an overall attenuation consistent with decoherence, and a residual portion that was not completely positive-although complete positivity is required for any quantum operation. By comparison with the results of computer simulations, the lack of complete positivity was shown to be largely a consequence of the incoherent errors which occurred over the full quantum process tomography procedure. These simulations further showed that coherent, incoherent, and decoherent errors can often be identified by their distinctive effects on the spectrum of the overall superoperator. The gate fidelity of the experimentally determined superoperator was 0.64, while the correlation coefficient between experimentally determined superoperator and the simulated superoperator was 0.79; most of the discrepancies with the simulations could be explained by the cummulative effect of small errors in the single qubit gates. (C) 2004 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:6117 / 6133
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Experimental demonstration of an entanglement swapping operation and improved control in NMR quantum-information processing [J].
Boulant, N ;
Edmonds, K ;
Yang, J ;
Pravia, MA ;
Cory, DG .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2003, 68 (03) :7
[2]   Robust method for estimating the Lindblad operators of a dissipative quantum process from measurements of the density operator at multiple time points [J].
Boulant, N ;
Havel, TF ;
Pravia, MA ;
Cory, DG .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2003, 67 (04) :12
[3]  
BOULANT N, QUANTPH0312116
[4]   Realization of quantum process tomography in NMR [J].
Childs, AM ;
Chuang, IL ;
Leung, DW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2001, 64 (01) :123141-123147
[5]  
Chuang IL, 1997, J MOD OPTIC, V44, P2455, DOI 10.1080/095003497152609
[6]  
Coppersmith D, 1994, RC19642 IBM, Patent No. 19642
[7]  
Cory DG, 2000, FORTSCHR PHYS, V48, P875, DOI 10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11<875::AID-PROP875>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-V
[9]   Measuring quantum optical Hamiltonians [J].
D'Ariano, GM ;
Maccone, L .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 80 (25) :5465-5468
[10]  
DARIANO GM, IN PRESS ADV IMAGING