Ambidextrous capacity in small and medium-sized enterprises

被引:34
作者
Augusto Felicio, J. [1 ]
Caldeirinha, Vitor [2 ]
Dutra, Ademar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Sch Econ & Management, Rua Miguel Lupi 20, P-1249078 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Ctr Management Studies, Sch Econ & Management, Rua Miguel Lupi 20, P-1249078 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] South Univ Santa Catarina UNISUL, Dept Appl Social Sci, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
Ambidextrous capacity; Organizational ambidexterity; Disruptive innovation; Incremental innovation; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; MEDIATING ROLE; EXPLORATION; INNOVATION; EXPLOITATION; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; ANTECEDENTS; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.061
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the ambidextrous capacity-the ability to respond simultaneously to both disruptive and incremental innovation processes-of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Portugal. The purpose is to understand the organizational ambidexterity of SMEs and its relationship to organizational performance and innovation capacity. The objectives are to evaluate the characteristics that identify ambidextrous organizations and analyze the effect of organizational ambidexterity on performance, supported by the contingency-based approach, organizational theory, behavioral theory of the firm, and organizational learning theory. After factor analysis is performed, a structural equations model is used to analyze a sample of 202 valid responses. The analysis shows that, for SMEs, disruptive innovation factors relate mainly to innovation capacity and incremental innovation factors relate to organizational performance. The confirmation of organizational ambidexterity in SMEs and the increased recognition of the importance of disruptive innovation are relevant contributions to the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 614
页数:8
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (01) :104-122
[2]   Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth [J].
Batt, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (03) :587-597
[3]  
Birkinshaw J, 2004, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V45, P47
[4]   CLARIFYING THE DISTINCTIVE CONTRIBUTION OF AMBIDEXTERITY TO THE FIELD OF ORGANIZATION STUDIES [J].
Birkinshaw, Julian ;
Gupta, Kamini .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (04) :287-298
[5]   A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity [J].
Bledow, Ronald ;
Frese, Michael ;
Anderson, Neil ;
Erez, Miriam ;
Farr, James .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (03) :305-337
[6]   Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance [J].
Boumgarden, Peter ;
Nickerson, Jackson ;
Zenger, Todd R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (06) :587-610
[7]  
Breitzman A., 2008, An analysis of small business patents by industry and firm size
[8]   THE IMPACT OF ORGANISATIONAL CONTEXT AND COMPETENCES ON INNOVATION AMBIDEXTERITY [J].
Brion, Sebastien ;
Mothey, Caroline ;
Sabatierz, Mareva .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 14 (02) :151-178
[9]   INTRAORGANIZATIONAL ECOLOGY OF STRATEGY MAKING AND ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION: THEORY AND FIELD RESEARCH [J].
Burgelman, Robert A. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (03) :239-262
[10]  
Burns T., 1961, The management of innovation